AND WE ARE ADJOURNED OUR SPECIAL MEETING AND WE'LL MOVE ON TO OUR WORKSHOP, MRS. [1. Discussion regarding Bond & TRE] [00:00:08] SMITH. GOOD MORNING. OKAY, SO FORMAT OF TODAY'S WORKSHOP, WE'RE GOING TO SPEND THE FIRST 20 TO 30 MINUTES OR SO TALKING ABOUT THE TAX RATE. BECAUSE WE HAVE NOT HAD A CHANCE TO DO THAT YET. AND THEN I'VE ASKED ESTHER TO COME AND GIVE SORT OF A BONDS 101, BECAUSE ONE OF THE THINGS I THINK THAT WE NEGLECTED DURING THE LAST PRESENTATION WAS JUST HOW MANY OF YOU HAVEN'T BEEN THROUGH THIS PROCESS BEFORE. SO WE'RE JUST GOING TO TAKE A LITTLE BIT OF A STEP BACK AND DO LIKE A HIGH LEVEL OVERVIEW OF THE BOND PROCESS AND YOUR ROLE AS A BOARD THROUGH THE BOND PROCESS. I JUST THINK THAT WILL BE HELPFUL. AND THEN WE'RE JUST GOING TO OPEN IT UP TO QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BOND AFTER THAT. BUT WE'RE GOING TO START WITH THE TAX RATE. I'VE SENT YOU GUYS MOST OF THIS INFORMATION IN HOME BASE, BUT I WANTED TO WALK THROUGH WHAT OUR TAX RATE LOOKS LIKE THIS YEAR AND KIND OF WHAT THE STEPS ARE TO ADOPT THE TAX RATE. SO TAX RATE BASICS. WE HAVE TWO PORTIONS OF OUR TAX RATE. THE M&O RATE, THE I&S RATE. M&O PAYS FOR OPERATIONS AND IS DETERMINED ANNUALLY BY THE STATE'S FUNDING FORMULA. THE I&S TAX RATE CAN ONLY BE USED TO SERVICE DEBT ON AUTHORIZED BONDS, AND IT'S DETERMINED ANNUALLY BASED ON THE REQUIRED PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST PAYMENTS THAT WE HAVE. AND THEN TOGETHER, THAT'S THE THAT'S THE TOTAL TAX RATE THAT PEOPLE SEE ON THEIR TAX BILL. SO THE I&S TAX RATE IS A PRETTY SIMPLE FORMULA. YOU TAKE YOUR ANTICIPATED DEBT PAYMENTS BOTH FOR CURRENTLY OUTSTANDING DEBT AND THEN FOR ANY NEW BONDS THAT YOU EXPECT TO ISSUE OVER THE NEXT YEAR ON AUTHORIZED BOND PROGRAMS. SO TOTAL ANTICIPATED PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST PAYMENTS ON DEBT FOR THE YEAR. YOU DIVIDE THAT BY YOUR TOTAL PROPERTY TAX BASE, AND THAT GIVES YOU THE TAX RATE THAT YOU NEED. SO IT'S A PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD FORMULA TO DETERMINE YOUR I&S TAX RATE. WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH THIS FORMULA EVERY YEAR AS PART OF OUR TRUTH IN TAXATION REQUIREMENTS. YOU CAN'T ADOPT A TAX RATE HIGHER THAN WHAT YOU NEED TO PAY DEBT. YOU CAN PAY OFF IF THE BOARD WANTS TO PAY OFF DEBT EARLY OR THINGS LIKE THAT. YOU CAN INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF YOUR ANTICIPATED DEBT PAYMENTS. IF YOU IF YOU HAVE AN EXPECTATION THAT WE PAY OFF DEBT FAST. AND THEN THAT KIND OF MANAGES THE TAX RATE. BUT ESSENTIALLY, IF YOUR DEBT PAYMENTS GO UP AND YOUR PROPERTY VALUES STAY THE SAME, THEN YOUR TAX RATE HAS TO GO UP TO PAY THE DEBT. IF YOUR PROPERTY VALUES GO UP, THEN YOU CAN SERVICE MORE DEBT AT THE SAME TAX RATE. AND THAT'S JUST KIND OF HOW THAT WORKS. SO OUR GOAL HAS BEEN TO MAINTAIN A STEADY I&S TAX RATE FOR OUR TAXPAYERS. SO BACK IN 2018 AND I'M GOING TO SHOW YOU SOME BOND HISTORY HERE OR TAX RATE HISTORY HERE IN A MINUTE. BUT BACK IN 2018 WITH THE 2018 BOND PROGRAM WE COMMITTED TO HOLDING THE DEBT TAX RATE AT $0.27 FOR WHAT WE THOUGHT AT THE TIME WAS GOING TO BE 2 TO 3 YEARS JUST BASED ON ANTICIPATED GROWTH. AND WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO HOLD IT STEADY THROUGH THE ENTIRE BOND PROGRAM AND IT'S STILL $0.27. OUR OUR GOAL IS NOT TO HAVE THE TAX RATE FOR TAXPAYERS KIND OF GO UP AND DOWN EVERY YEAR. SO WE HAVE SOME MECHANISMS IN PLACE THINGS LIKE OUR I&S FUND BALANCE AND THE USE OF TIRZ FUNDS TO HELP KEEP THAT TAX RATE STEADY FOR PEOPLE. SO IF WE DON'T HIT ONE OF THOSE EXPECTATIONS THAT WE NEED TO HIT TO KEEP IT AT $0.27, WE HAVE OTHER THINGS THAT CAN COME INTO PLAY BEFORE WE HAVE TO RAISE THE TAX RATE. THE M&O TAX RATE STRUCTURE IS A LITTLE BIT MORE COMPLICATED. THE M&O TAX RATE STRUCTURE MIRRORS THE SCHOOL FUNDING FORMULA. SO THE SCHOOL FUNDING FORMULA HAS TWO TIERS. TIER ONE, WHICH IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A BASIC EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM FOR ALL STUDENTS. AND THEN TIER TWO WHICH IS ENRICHMENT FUNDING. AND SO OUR TAX RATE IS OUR M&O TAX RATE IS ALSO BROKEN UP INTO TIER ONE AND TIER TWO PORTIONS. SO THIS IS KIND OF WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE. TIER ONE, THE TIER ONE PORTION OF OUR TAX RATE IS ALSO KNOWN AS THE COMPRESSED TAX RATE. THAT PORTION OF THE M&O TAX RATE CHANGES ANNUALLY, AND IT'S DETERMINED BY TEA BASED ON ANNUAL PROPERTY VALUE GROWTH. SO EVERY JULY USUALLY AROUND JULY 25TH, WE RECEIVE CERTIFIED APPRAISED VALUES FROM DENTON AND COLLIN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICTS. WE TAKE THOSE CERTIFIED APPRAISED VALUES WE SEND THEM TO TEA. THEY DO A LITTLE CALCULATION OF HOW MUCH OUR VALUES GREW FROM ONE YEAR TO THE NEXT, AND THEN THEY TELL US WHAT OUR TIER ONE TAX RATE HAS TO BE. IF WE DON'T SET OUR TIER ONE TAX RATE AT THAT RATE THAT TEA TELLS US, THEN WE DON'T GET OUR FULL STATE FUNDING. SO THAT IS DETERMINED BY THE STATE'S FUNDING FORMULA. THE TIER TWO PORTION OF OUR TAX RATE, ALSO CALLED THE ENRICHMENT TAX RATE, IS MADE UP OF GOLDEN PENNIES AND COPPER PENNIES. YOU CAN HAVE A TOTAL OF $0.17 IN YOUR TIER TWO TAX RATE. [00:05:04] THE FIRST EIGHT OF THOSE 17 ARE CALLED GOLDEN PENNIES. THAT MEANS THAT THE STATE'S FUNDING FORMULA GIVES US MORE MONEY THAN WE GENERATE LOCALLY. SO THEY'RE EQUALIZED TO A HIGHER YIELD. THE REMAINING NINE, IF YOU HAVE EXERCISED, THOSE ARE EQUALIZED TO A LOWER YIELD. YOU PAY RECAPTURE ON COPPER PENNIES, YOU DON'T PAY RECAPTURE ON GOLDEN PENNIES. AND SO YOU CAN HAVE, LIKE I SAID, A MAXIMUM OF EIGHT GOLDEN PENNIES, WHICH WE HAVE IN OUR TAX RATE CURRENTLY AND THEN A MAXIMUM OF NINE COPPER PENNIES. WE CURRENTLY HAVE A LITTLE OVER FIVE COPPER PENNIES APPROVED IN OUR TAX RATE. AND WITH THE WITH THE VATRE THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, WE WOULD BE REQUESTING THE REMAINING THREE AND CHANGE. SO THIS IS JUST A LOOK AT OUR TAX RATE HISTORY BY YEAR FROM 2018 TO 2023. JUST SOMETHING THAT PEOPLE GET CONFUSED ON SOMETIMES. THE 2023 TAX RATE, IT WAS FOR THE 23-24 SCHOOL YEAR. YOU'LL BE ASKED TO VOTE ON THE 2024 TAX RATE IN A COUPLE OF WEEKS FOR THE 24-25 SCHOOL YEAR. SO YOU ALWAYS TAKE THE FIRST FIRST YEAR. SO 2018 THROUGH 2023. I'VE BROKEN OUR M&O TAX RATE DOWN IN THOSE DIFFERENT TIERS JUST SO YOU CAN SEE THE CHANGE. SO YOU CAN SEE EVERY YEAR THAT TIER ONE TAX RATE HAS GONE DOWN BASED ON TEAS CALCULATIONS, THERE WAS A SIGNIFICANT DECREASE IN THAT PORTION OF THE TAX RATE FROM 2022 TO 2023 BECAUSE OF STATEWIDE PROPERTY TAX RELIEF THAT WAS PASSED IN THE 88TH LEGISLATIVE SESSION. SO THERE WAS A LARGE COMPRESSION OF OUR TIER ONE TAX RATE AT THAT TIME. IN 2018 WE HAD SIX GOLDEN PENNIES IN 2019, WHEN THE STATE PASSED HOUSE BILL THREE AND CHANGED THE SCHOOL FUNDING FORMULA, WE GOT ACCESS TO TWO MORE GOLDEN PENNIES. AND SO WE'VE HAD ALL EIGHT GOLDEN PENNIES EVER SINCE. AND THEN IN 2018, WE HAD 11 COPPER PENNIES. THAT WAS THE MAXIMUM THAT WE COULD HAVE AT THE TIME. IN 2019 THROUGH HB THREE, WE WERE REQUIRED TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPPER PENNIES THAT WE HAD PART OF THE STATE'S FUNDING FORMULA. WHEN CERTAIN THINGS HAPPEN IN THE STATE'S FUNDING FORMULA, YOU'RE REQUIRED TO COMPRESS YOUR COPPER, YOUR TIER TWO TAX RATE. SO THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED. WE'VE BEEN AT 5.8 COPPER PENNIES EVER SINCE. SO THIS YEAR, FOR 2024, WE ARE RECOMMENDING EXERCISING THOSE ADDITIONAL THREE AND CHANGE COPPER PENNIES. IT'S ACTUALLY A TOTAL OF 2.94 CENTS INCREASE IN THE TOTAL TAX OR IN THE M&O TAX RATE. BECAUSE AS YOU CAN SEE, THE TIER ONE PORTION HAS GONE DOWN A LITTLE BIT AS CALCULATED BY TEA. SO WE'RE ESSENTIALLY WHILE WE HAD ALL OF THE COPPER PENNIES BACK IN 2018, THEN THE STATE MADE US REDUCE THOSE AND NOW WE'RE ASKING FOR THEM BACK. THE ADOPTION OF THIS HIGH, THIS M&O TAX RATE, BECAUSE WE'RE, WE'RE EXERCISING THOSE COPPER PENNY, THAT COPPER PENNY AUTHORITY WOULD TRIGGER A VOTER APPROVAL TAX RATE ELECTION. IT WOULD GENERATE APPROXIMATELY $11.5 MILLION NET TO THE DISTRICT IN TIER TWO REVENUE. SO THAT'S A $19.5 MILLION INCREASE IN PROPERTY TAX REVENUE. BUT THEN AN $8 MILLION INCREASE IN RECAPTURE FOR A NET OF $11.5 MILLION TO THE DISTRICT. SO IF YOU TAKE THAT M&O TAX RATE AND THEN YOU ADD ON OUR I&S TAX RATE, LIKE I SAID, IT'S BEEN $0.27 SINCE 2018. AND WE ARE RECOMMENDING IT REMAIN AT $0.27. YOU CAN SEE THERE JUST THE CHANGE IN THE TOTAL TAX RATE OVER THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT BRIAN GRUBBS PRESENTED DURING THE LAST WEEK'S BOND WORKSHOP. AND I KIND OF I THOUGHT I'D BRING IT BACK UP AND MAYBE STATE IT A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENTLY, BECAUSE I KNOW THERE WAS QUITE A BIT OF DISCUSSION AROUND IT. ESSENTIALLY, IF INTEREST RATES STAY BELOW 5%, WHICH IS THEY'RE WELL BELOW 5% NOW AND IF OUR PROPERTY VALUES GROW BY AT LEAST $2.7 BILLION PER YEAR WHICH THEY HAVE HISTORICALLY GROWN SIGNIFICANTLY MORE THAN $2.7 BILLION, BUT THAT'S KIND OF THE MINIMUM EXPECTATIONS THAT WE NEED TO HAVE IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN A 27% OR BETTER DEBT TAX RATE. SO, LIKE, BRIAN WAS KIND OF TRYING TO PROVE UP DURING THAT WORKSHOP, HIS ASSUMPTIONS ARE THAT WE WILL HIT THOSE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OVER THE COURSE OF THE RECOMMENDED BOND PROGRAM AND BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN A $0.27 DEBT TAX RATE. AND LIKE I SAID A MINUTE AGO, EVEN IF WE DON'T HIT THOSE MINIMUM ASSUMPTIONS, WE HAVE SOME MECHANISMS IN PLACE TO MANAGE THE TAX RATE BEFORE WE HAVE TO RAISE THAT DEBT [00:10:07] RATE, WE CAN UTILIZE SOME TIRZ FUNDS. WE CAN UTILIZE I&S FUND BALANCE. WE CAN WE CAN DO SOME DIFFERENT THINGS BEFORE WE WOULD HAVE TO RAISE THAT RATE FOR OUR COMMUNITY. SO THE IMPACT ON THE AVERAGE HOMEOWNER OF THIS INCREASE IN TAX RATE THAT WE ARE ASKING FOR ON THE M&O SIDE YOU CAN SEE HERE THE 2023 VERSUS 2024 AVERAGE MARKET VALUE VERSUS AVERAGE TAXABLE VALUE. SO KEEP IN MIND THAT HOMEOWNERS HAVE HOMESTEAD EXEMPTIONS. THEY'RE ALSO CAPPED AT THE AMOUNT OF ASSESSED VALUE GROWTH EACH YEAR. SO EVEN THOUGH THE MARKET HAS TAKEN OFF OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS ASSESSED VALUES DON'T GROW BY AS MUCH AS THE MARKET DOES YEAR OVER YEAR. YOU CAN SEE THERE THE TAX RATE FROM LAST YEAR AND THEN THE PROPOSED TAX RATE FOR THIS YEAR. AND THEN THE INCREASE OF ABOUT $759. I DO WANT TO POINT OUT THAT $601 OF THAT INCREASE FROM YEAR TO YEAR IS BECAUSE OF APPRAISALS. SO THAT AVERAGE TAXABLE VALUE OF A HOME GOING UP, WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT THE DISTRICT DOESN'T HAVE CONTROL OVER THAT'S APPRAISED BY THE APPRAISAL DISTRICTS. THEN THE IMPACT OF THE ACTUAL INCREASE IN THE TAX RATE THAT WE'RE ASKING FOR IS ABOUT $159 A YEAR ON THIS AVERAGE HOME IN FRISCO ISD. HERE IS A LOOK AT THE TAX RATE HISTORY TAX BILL HISTORY. SO THIS IS SINCE 2018, YOU CAN SEE THAT THE STATE'S FUNDING FORMULA AND THE WAY THAT M&O TAXES WORK, IT'S MEANT TO TRY AND KEEP HOMEOWNERS PAYING ROUGHLY THE SAME AMOUNT YEAR OVER YEAR. THAT'S THAT'S HOW THAT FORMULA WORKS. AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THAT IN GENERAL, IT KIND OF DOES. YOU CAN SEE THE SIGNIFICANT DECREASE FROM 2022 TO 2023 BECAUSE OF THE INCREASE IN THE HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION. AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE INCREASE THAT WE ARE RECOMMENDING FOR 2024. I FORGOT TO TAKE OFF THAT END 2023 DOLLARS. IGNORE THAT. I'LL TAKE THAT OFF LATER. YOU CAN SEE THE LITTLE PORTION IN BLUE I KIND OF BRACKETED THE AMOUNT OF INCREASE RELATED TO APPRAISALS, AND THEN THAT LITTLE TINY PORTION IN PURPLE IS THE AMOUNT OF INCREASE. OOPS, SORRY. UP HERE? NOPE. BACK UP. UP HERE. THIS LITTLE TINY PORTION IS THE AMOUNT OF INCREASE RELATED TO THE RATE JUST SO YOU CAN SEE IT GRAPHICALLY. ALSO IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER THAT APPRAISAL INCREASES DON'T GENERATE MORE MONEY FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. ALL ALL AN APPRAISAL INCREASE DOES IS REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT WE GET FROM THE STATE, BECAUSE WE CAN GENERATE MORE LOCALLY. THE ONLY THING THAT GENERATES MORE MONEY FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT IS TO RAISE THE TAX RATE. SO THE WAY THAT THE SCHOOL FUNDING FORMULA WORKS, IF A PERSON'S HOUSE VALUE GOES UP AND THEY PAY MORE IN TAXES. IT DECREASES THE AMOUNT OF STATE AID THAT WE GET. WE THERE'S A THERE'S AN OFFSETTING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROPERTY TAXES AND STATE AID. BUT IF WE INCREASE THAT RATE, THEN WE ARE ALLOWED TO KEEP A PORTION OF THAT REVENUE. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? HOPEFULLY, NO. OKAY. I DON'T HAVE MY SCHOOL FINANCE 101 SLIDES HERE, SO I'M GOING TO TRY TO EXPLAIN IT WITHOUT A VISUAL ON THE SCREEN. THE STATE'S FUNDING FORMULA, THE WAY THAT IT WORKS IS IT'S SHARED, THE TOTAL ENTITLEMENT THAT WE HAVE AS A SCHOOL DISTRICT IS SHARED BETWEEN LOCAL TAXES AND STATE AID. SO THE FORMULA ITSELF CALCULATES HOW MUCH WE ARE ENTITLED TO BASED ON THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS ENROLLED, THEIR ATTENDANCE RATES, AND ANY WEIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SETTINGS THAT THEY'RE SERVED IN. SO IF THEY'RE SPECIAL ED, THEY HAVE A HIGHER WEIGHT BILINGUAL, THEY HAVE A HIGHER WEIGHT, ETC.. SO YOU CALCULATE YOUR DISTRICT'S ENTITLEMENT FIRST, AND THEN THE FORMULA TAKES INTO ACCOUNT HOW MUCH OF THAT ENTITLEMENT YOU CAN GENERATE THROUGH PROPERTY TAXES. AND THAT'S, THAT'S BASED ON YOUR ASSESSED VALUES AND THEN THE RATE THAT THE STATE TELLS YOU TO SET. SO YOU GENERATE AS MUCH AS YOU CAN THROUGH PROPERTY TAXES. AND THEN THE STATE FILLS IN THE DIFFERENCE WITH STATE AID. SO IF PROPERTY VALUES GO UP, THAT MEANS YOU CAN GENERATE MORE OF YOUR ENTITLEMENT SHARE WITH LOCAL TAXES, AND THE STATE HAS TO KICK IN LESS TO FILL UP THAT CUP. IF PROPERTY VALUES WERE TO GO DOWN, THE STATE WOULD HAVE TO KICK IN MORE BECAUSE YOUR ENTITLEMENT DOESN'T CHANGE, YOUR ENTITLEMENT IS BASED ON THAT FORMULA. NOW THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS IF YOU HAVE NOT EXERCISED ALL OF YOUR AVAILABLE PENNIES IN THAT TIER TWO TAX RATE, SO THAT ENRICHMENT PORTION OF THE FORMULA IS BASED ON HOW MANY PENNIES ARE IN YOUR TAX RATE. [00:15:04] SO RIGHT NOW WE ARE NOT EXERCISING ALL OF OUR TAXING AUTHORITY FOR THOSE COPPER PENNIES. MEANING IF WE DO EXERCISE THAT AUTHORITY, WE DO GET TO KEEP SOME OF THEM. SO OUR TAX REVENUE GOES UP, OUR RECAPTURE ALSO GOES UP. BUT WE DO GET TO NET ADDITIONAL DOLLARS FOR THE DISTRICT. SO JUST SOME TAX RATE TERMINOLOGY. BECAUSE ON OUR TRUTH AND TAXATION NOTICES YOU SEE DIFFERENT NUMBERS AND IT'S HARD TO KNOW WHICH ONE IS WHICH. SO THERE ARE TWO INFORMATIONAL TAX RATES THAT GET PUBLISHED. WE DON'T THAT WE DON'T DO ANYTHING WITH. THEY'RE INFORMATIONAL ONLY. THE FIRST ONE IS THE NO NEW REVENUE TAX RATE. THAT'S THE RATE THAT WOULD PRODUCE THE SAME TAX LEVY AS LAST YEAR. IT'S INTENDED TO TELL TAXPAYERS THE EFFECT OF THE TAX RATE ON THEM MEANING THEIR, THEIR TOTAL TAX RATE, BECAUSE THEIR APPRAISALS ARE GOING UP IN ORDER TO GENERATE THE SAME AMOUNT OF MONEY, WE COULD LOWER THE TAX RATE. EXCEPT THAT'S NOT HOW SCHOOL FINANCE WORKS. THAT'S MORE MEANINGFUL FOR CITIES AND OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS, BUT IT'S STILL A NUMBER THAT GETS PUBLISHED FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS. THEN THERE'S THE RATE TO MAINTAIN REVENUE. SO THIS IS THE RATE THAT WILL PRODUCE THE SAME AMOUNT OF REVENUE AS LAST YEAR. SO THIS IS THE INFORMATIONAL RATE THAT TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THAT INTERACTION BETWEEN LOCAL TAXES AND STATE AID AND RECAPTURE. SO AGAIN, THIS IS NOT A RATE THAT WE ACTUALLY USE IN TERMS OF WHAT WE CAN ADOPT, BUT IT IS AN INFORMATIONAL RATE. SO YOU CAN SEE THAT WHEN YOU TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THAT INTERPLAY BETWEEN STATE AID AND LOCAL TAXES, OUR RATE TO MAINTAIN THE SAME AMOUNT OF REVENUE AS $1.599. AND THEN THE TWO THAT WE REALLY NEED TO PAY ATTENTION TO AND THAT MEAN THE MOST IS THE VOTER APPROVAL TAX RATE AND THEN THE MAXIMUM TAX RATE. SO THE VOTER APPROVAL TAX RATE IS THE MAXIMUM TAX RATE THAT CAN BE ADOPTED WITHOUT AN ELECTION. THIS USED TO BE KNOWN AS THE ROLLBACK RATE. SO ESSENTIALLY YOUR VOTER APPROVAL TAX RATE IS GOING TO BE WHATEVER I&S TAX RATE YOU NEED TO PAY YOUR DEBT PLUS WHATEVER M&O TAX RATE TEA CALCULATES FOR YOU AND THEN WHATEVER GOLDEN AND COPPER PENNIES HAVE ALREADY BEEN APPROVED BY VOTERS. SO FOR US, THAT'S $1. 252. YOUR MAXIMUM TAX RATE IS ESSENTIALLY ALL OF YOUR AVAILABLE TAXING AUTHORITY. SO THOSE ADDITIONAL THREE ISH PENNIES IN THE COPPER PENNY SECTION OF THE TAX RATE THAT WE HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED YET. IF WE WERE TO ADD THOSE ADDITIONAL THREE PENNIES ONTO OUR VOTER APPROVAL TAX RATE, THAT'S WHERE WE GET OUR MAXIMUM TAX RATE. ADOPTING THIS RATE TRIGGERS A VOTER APPROVAL TAX RATE ELECTION. AND SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING DOING. SO OUR MAXIMUM TAX RATE AND THE RATE THAT WE ARE PROPOSING THE BOARD ADOPT AND TRIGGER AN ELECTION IS $1.569. SO YOU CAN SEE ABOUT $0.03 HIGHER THAN THE VOTER APPROVAL TAX RATE. I ASK YOU A QUESTION, KIM. YES. THE RATE TO MAINTAIN REVENUE IS 1.0599. WHY DID THAT GO UP? WHY IS THAT HIGHER. SO THIS IS TOTAL. THIS IS TOTAL TAX RATE. SO M&O AND I&S AND SO OUR I&S TAX RATE ACTUALLY CALCULATED THAT WE WOULD NEED MORE THAN $0.27. HOWEVER, WE'RE NOT RECOMMENDING RAISING IT MORE THAN $0.27 BECAUSE WE HAVE THE FUND I&S F UND BALANCE AND TIRZ MONEY THAT WE CAN USE TO KEEP IT AT $0.27. SO THAT LITTLE BIT OF EXTRA IT'S COMING FROM I&S, WHAT THE, WHAT THE CALCULATION SHOWS THE I&S TAX RATE NEEDS TO BE. IT GETS VERY THOSE CALCULATIONS GET VERY CONVOLUTED. I'LL BE HAPPY TO SEND YOU THE WORKSHEET THAT THE TAX OFFICE DOES FOR US, SO THAT YOU CAN KIND OF SEE THE BREAKDOWN. BUT LIKE I SAID, THOSE ARE INFORMATIONAL RATES THAT GET PUBLISHED ACCORDING TO THE TAX RATE CALCULATION THAT THE TAX OFFICE DOES FOR US. YES. THERE'S A-- THE COMPTROLLER PUTS OUT A TAX RATE CALCULATION TO CALCULATE THOSE INFORMATIONAL RATES. AND SO ACCORDING TO THAT CALCULATION THEN THAT WOULD THAT'S WHAT THE RATE WOULD HAVE TO BE IN ORDER FOR US TO GENERATE THE SAME AMOUNT. YEAH. GO AHEAD. SO WHEN WE SAY WHEN WE TALK ABOUT HOW THE TIRZ ZONE HELPS KEEP THE TAX RATE A LITTLE BIT LOWER, THIS IS A GREAT EXAMPLE OF WHAT THAT IS. RIGHT. BECAUSE THEY USE THE SAME CALCULATION FOR EVERY DISTRICT. THEY DON'T KNOW THAT WE HAVE THE TIRZ ZONE. RIGHT. AND BECAUSE WE HAVE THAT ZONE, WE'RE ABLE TO KEEP THE DEBT TAX RATE A LITTLE BIT LOWER AND BECAUSE OF FUND BALANCE IN IT. [00:20:07] BUT THEY USE THIS THEY USE THIS BROAD TAX RATE FOR EVERYBODY. SO THIS IS JUST A NUMBER THAT'S REALLY THAT'S A NUMBER THAT SOMEBODY ELSE CALCULATES FOR ALL SCHOOL DISTRICTS. YES. YEAH. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. YEAH. AND SO EVEN WHAT I WOULD SAY IS EVEN IF WE WANTED TO ADOPT, I MEAN, WE COULD ADOPT THAT HIGHER TAX RATE BECAUSE WE COULD INCREASE THE THE I&S TAX RATE. BUT WE HAVE MECHANISMS IN PLACE SO THAT WE DON'T NEED TO. SO IN A LOT OF DISTRICTS THAT DON'T HAVE THOSE MECHANISMS IN PLACE, THAT RATE TO MAINTAIN REVENUE MIGHT BE EQUAL TO THE MAXIMUM TAX RATE. OKAY. SO HERE'S A TIMELINE OF EVENTS. AND THEN I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE TAX RATE BEFORE WE MOVE ON TO BOND DISCUSSION. ON AUGUST 19TH BECAUSE WE ARE PROPOSING RAISING THE TAX RATE, WE WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE TAX RATE. THAT NOTICE HAS ALREADY BEEN PUBLISHED IN THE FRISCO ENTERPRISE. IT'S REQUIRED TO BE PUBLISHED IN A LOCAL NEWSPAPER, AT LEAST TEN DAYS PRIOR TO. SO WE'VE PUBLISHED THAT NOTICE ALREADY. SO WE'LL HAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN THE VOTE ON THE TAX RATE AND ADOPTION OF ELECTION ORDERS THE SAME NIGHT AT YOUR REGULAR BOARD MEETING. IN SEPTEMBER, AT YOUR REGULAR BOARD MEETING, WE WILL HOLD A PUBLIC DISCUSSION ON THE EFFICIENCY AUDIT. SO ANY TIME A SCHOOL DISTRICT ASKS THE VOTERS TO RAISE THE TAX RATE, WE HAVE TO HAVE AN EFFICIENCY AUDIT DONE. I THINK IT MIGHT BE CALLED SOMETHING OTHER THAN AN EFFICIENCY AUDIT IN TECHNICAL TERMS, BUT ESSENTIALLY WE ASK OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS TO COME IN AND DO AN AUDIT OR A SET OF AGREED UPON PROCEDURES TO REVIEW OUR SPENDING COMPARED TO OTHER DISTRICTS. SO THAT FINANCIAL BENCHMARKING THAT I SHOW YOU GUYS EVERY YEAR DURING THE BUDGET PROCESS, THE EFFICIENCY AUDIT IS VERY SIMILAR TO THAT. THERE ARE SOME OTHER QUESTIONS. YEAH. GO AHEAD. THE EFFICIENCY AUDIT DOES NOT. IT JUST LOOKS AT US AS COMPARED TO OTHER DISTRICTS. IT DOESN'T COME IN AND SEE THAT WE'RE RUNNING OUR OPERATIONS AS EFFICIENTLY AS POSSIBLE. IT IS BOTH. SO THE THE AUDITS, THE THINGS THAT THE AUDITORS HAVE TO LOOK AT ARE PRESCRIBED BY STATUTE. SO EVERY SCHOOL DISTRICT THAT GOES THROUGH A VATRE HAS TO HAVE AN EFFICIENCY AUDIT DONE. AND THE AUDITORS USE THE EXACT SAME AUDIT PROGRAM. SO THEY ASK THE SAME QUESTIONS, THEY DO THE SAME FINANCIAL BENCHMARKING. THEY USE THEY USE THE SAME METHODOLOGY TO SELECT A DISTRICTS TO COMPARE US TO. SO THERE ARE QUESTIONS IN THERE ABOUT HOW WE RUN OUR OWN OPERATIONS, BUT THEN THERE'S ALSO A PORTION THAT COMPARES US TO OTHER DISTRICTS. AND LIKE I SAID, IT'S IT'S PRESCRIBED BY THE STATE. WHAT HAS TO BE PART OF THAT AUDIT. AND SO WE ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE THAT AUDIT DONE AND THEN HAVE DISCUSSED THE RESULTS OF IT IN A PUBLIC MEETING AT LEAST 30 DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION. SO, WEAVER, OUR EXTERNAL AUDITORS HAVE ALREADY BEGUN WORK ON THE EFFICIENCY AUDIT IN ANTICIPATION OF THIS AND SO THAT WILL BE READY TO DISCUSS AT THE SEPTEMBER 16TH BOARD MEETING, WHICH IS WELL IN ADVANCE OF 30 DAYS BEFORE ELECTION DAY. AND THEN NOVEMBER 5TH WOULD BE ELECTION DAY. SO QUESTIONS ON THE TAX RATE PORTION OR THE TAX RATE OR ANY OF WHAT I JUST WENT THROUGH. AND KIM, CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE ONE WHERE WE SHOW THE RECAPTURE? YEAH, THIS ONE, THE IF WE RAISE TO, I MEAN, $2.94, THEN THERE'S A RECAPTURE OF $8 MILLION. YEAH. SO CAN WE RAISE SLIGHTLY LESS SO THAT THE RECAPTURE CAN BE? THE RECAPTURE WILL BE PROPORTIONAL TO THE NUMBER OF PENNIES THAT YOU INCREASE. SO ROUGHLY, YOU CAN ESTIMATE THAT FOR EVERY PENNY WE INCREASE, WE GET TO KEEP TWO THIRDS OF IT. IF YOU WANT TO JUST DO KIND OF, LIKE, QUICK MATH IN YOUR HEAD. SO IF WE YOU IF WE ASKED FOR FEWER PENNIES, WE WOULD HAVE LOWER RECAPTURE, BUT WE WOULD NET FEWER DOLLARS AS WELL. SO IT'S IT'S PROPORTIONAL. SO THERE'S NO WAY OUT FROM THE RECAPTURE. NO, THERE'S NO WAY OUT FROM THE RECAPTURE. CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE SLIDE THAT SHOWED THE, THE IMPACT ON THE HOME BASED ON THE VALUE OF THE HOME? OKAY. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT I'M CLEAR ON THIS. THIS IS JUST FOR THE VATRE, THE $158. [00:25:06] RIGHT, BECAUSE THE I&S TAX RATE, WE'RE NOT RECOMMENDING CHANGING. SO IT'S THE TOTAL TAX RATE. THE DOLLAR 569 IS THE TAX RATE INCLUDING THE VATRE AND THE I&S RATE OF $0.27. BUT THAT INCREASE OF $158 IS THE INCREASE FOR THE VATRE. OKAY. YEAH. HOPEFULLY WE HAVE A SIMILAR SLIDE THAT SHOWS THE IMPACT OF THE BOND. SO WE ARE NOT WE ARE NOT RECOMMENDING RAISING THE I&S TAX RATE WITH THE BOND. SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING $0.27. SO THERE'S NO THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE A DIFFERENCE. OKAY. SORRY. THAT QUESTION WASN'T CLEAR. WHAT I'M WONDERING IS AND WE CAN WE CAN DEFER THIS TILL WE GET THERE, IF YOU'D LIKE, BUT LET ME JUST ASK THE QUESTION NOW. SO WE HAVE CURRENT BONDS THAT EXPIRE, AND IF THESE NEW BONDS ARE NOT APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC, THEN THOSE BONDS GO AWAY AND THAT PORTION IS NOT INCLUDED, RIGHT? IT GOES AWAY BECAUSE THEY EXPIRE. SURE. IF THESE BONDS ARE PASSED, THAT REPLACES THAT. CORRECT. SO THAT IT CONTINUES ON FOR HOWEVER MANY YEARS. YES. OKAY. SO I THINK THAT WOULD BE IMPORTANT. YOU MAY NOT HAVE IT TODAY, BUT I THINK THAT WOULD BE IMPORTANT FOR THE COMMUNITY TO KNOW IS IF BOND PASSES PROPERTY TAX REMAIN IF BOND DOES NOT PASS PROPERTY TAX IS X. OKAY, I UNDERSTAND I GET WHERE YOU'RE GOING NOW. IF SO. SO YOU GUYS WILL BE ASKED TO ADOPT THE TAX RATE ON AUGUST 19TH, WHICH WOULD INCLUDE A $0.27 DEBT TAX RATE. SO FOR THE COMING YEAR, WHETHER THE BOND PASSES OR NOT, THAT THE RATE WILL BE $0.27 BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE ADOPTING IN AUGUST AHEAD OF THE ELECTION. GOING FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR, THE 2025 TAX RATE, IF THE BOND OR A PORTION OF THE BONDS WERE NOT TO PASS, PART OF WHAT WE WOULD DO DURING THE BUDGET PROCESS IN THE SPRING IS TALK ABOUT AS A BOARD, DO WHAT WHAT DOES THE DEBT TAX RATE LOOK LIKE IF WE JUST CONTINUE TO SERVICE THE DEBT THAT WE HAVE OUTSTANDING? DO WE NEED TO CONSIDER PAYING OFF SOME DEBT EARLY? AND THOSE KINDS OF THINGS. AND THEN BASED ON THAT DISCUSSION WITH THE BOARD IN THE SPRING, WE WOULD DETERMINE HOW THE DEBT TAX RATE WOULD CHANGE. SO THERE ARE TOO MANY VARIABLES TO CONSIDER THAT WOULD HAPPEN BETWEEN NOW AND NEXT YEAR, TO SAY FOR SURE THE I&S TAX RATE WOULD GO DOWN BY X AMOUNT OF DOLLARS IF THE BOND DIDN'T PASS. DOES THAT DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? IT DOES MAKE SENSE. BUT I'M TRYING TO PUT MYSELF IN THE POSITION OF A HOMEOWNER, RIGHT. OR JUST A TAXPAYER IN THE COMMUNITY BECAUSE THIS IS REALLY HELPFUL, RIGHT? I CAN LOOK AT THIS AND I CAN SAY, DO I THINK THAT WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED BY THIS VATRE IS WORTH IT TO ME TO PAY AN EXTRA $158 IF MY HOME IS WORTH $727,000, RIGHT? THAT'S HELPFUL INFORMATION. SURE, I CAN MAKE THAT DECISION. DO I VOTE YES OR I DO I VOTE NO, RIGHT, AS A AS A VOTER. IF I AM A VOTER AND I WANT TO DECIDE HOW TO DO ON THE BOND WITHOUT THAT INFORMATION, IT'S JUST LIKE IT'S NOT REAL TO THEM, RIGHT? YES. LIKE HOW MUCH MORE IS THIS GOING TO COST ME, AND DO I THINK IT'S WORTH IT? YEAH. I TOTALLY SEE WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM. I'M NOT TRYING TO TO GET OUT OF CALCULATING THAT FOR YOU. LET ME BE CLEAR ABOUT THAT. BUT I THINK IF THE IF A VOTER WERE TO VOTE NO, IT WOULD HAVE NO IMPACT ON THEIR TAX BILL THIS YEAR. IT MAY HAVE AN IMPACT ON THEIR TAX BILL IN THE FUTURE, GIVEN A NUMBER OF OTHER VARIABLES. SO I'M JUST I'M WORRIED IF WE WERE TO JUST COME UP WITH A NUMBER THAT IT MIGHT NOT BE REALISTIC BECAUSE OF THE OTHER VARIABLES WE'D HAVE TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION. BUT I MEAN, LET ME GO BACK AND KIND OF JUST LOOK AT WHAT THAT MIGHT LOOK LIKE IN THE CALCULATIONS. AND WE CAN HAVE ADDITIONAL CONVERSATION ABOUT IT, BUT IT'S JUST BECAUSE OF THOSE OTHER VARIABLES THAT IT'S, YOU KNOW, I WOULD I WOULD HATE TO SAY, PUT SOMETHING OUT THAT SAYS, THIS IS FOR SURE WHAT WOULD HAPPEN WHEN THERE ARE OTHER VARIABLES THAT WE DON'T HAVE YET. RIGHT? NO, I UNDERSTAND, AND IT ALL OBVIOUSLY IS DEPENDENT ON PROPERTY VALUES, WHICH ABSOLUTELY, WE DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN. BUT I'M JUST THINKING AS A VOTER, I WANT TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT ON ME SO THAT WHEN I CAST MY VOTE, I UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS MEANS FOR ME. AND I THINK, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE A LOT OF COMMUNITY MEMBERS WHO EXPRESS INTEREST ABOUT THEIR PROPERTY TAXES, RIGHT? BECAUSE OF MOSTLY BECAUSE OF THE INCREASE IN PROPERTY VALUE. [00:30:01] YOUR PROPERTY TAX GOES UP. SO IF YOU BOUGHT YOUR HOME FOR $400,000, RIGHT, 15 YEARS AGO AND IT'S NOW WORTH $728,000, YOU DIDN'T BUDGET FOR THAT WHEN YOU BOUGHT THE HOME, RIGHT? SO YOUR MORTGAGE PAYMENT MIGHT BE THE SAME, BUT YOUR PROPERTY TAX IS GOING UP. AND SO I JUST WE HAVE A LOT OF MEMBERS IN OUR COMMUNITY STRUGGLING TO PAY GAS, GROCERIES, ALL THESE THINGS. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE IMPACT TO THE DEGREE THAT WE CAN CALCULATE IT, UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE'S A LOT OF DIFFERENT FACTORS, IT'S HELPFUL FOR PEOPLE. OTHERWISE I DON'T KNOW HOW THEY WOULD MAKE A DECISION. I MEAN, YEAH, I GET I GET WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, BUT THIS IS REALLY HELPFUL. I MEAN, THE VATRE, IT'S RIGHT THERE. RIGHT. SO YOU CAN OBVIOUSLY, IF YOUR HOME IS WORTH $500,000, YOU'RE NOT PAYING $158, RIGHT? YOU'RE PAYING SOMETHING LESS THAN THAT. SO I DON'T KNOW. I JUST THINK AS MUCH INFORMATION AS WE CAN PROVIDE, MAKING IT CLEAR THAT THERE ARE VARIABLES THAT IMPACT THIS, I THINK WOULD BE HELPFUL. CAN I CAN I PIGGYBACK ON WHAT YOU SAID? I'M AS IT STANDS RIGHT NOW, I'M FOR THE BOND PACKAGE AND THE WAY I'M GOING TO BE POSITIONING IT IS NOT GOING TO IMPACT YOUR BOTTOM LINE ON TAXES. IT'S A GOOD THING, A GREAT WAY TO UPDATE THE SCHOOLS AND EVERYTHING. AND IT'S NOT GOING TO HURT YOU ONE WAY. BUT THEN, LIKE STEPHANIE WAS SAYING, WELL, THEY MIGHT NOT GO FOR THAT. I SAY, WELL, WELL, WHAT HAPPEN IF WE DIDN'T PASS THE AND WHAT WOULD WHAT WOULD AN ANSWER TO THAT BE? WELL, HERE'S WHAT WE CAN DO. WHAT IF WE WERE TO TRY AND CALCULATE SOME KIND OF A RANGE TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THOSE VARIABLES AND THEN I CAN SHARE THAT WITH YOU GUYS. BUT YEAH, THE ANSWER IS IF IF A BOND WEREN'T TO PASS, THEN IN TERMS OF YOUR TAX BILL, THERE'S A CHANCE THAT THE DISTRICT WOULD LOWER THE I&S PORTION OF THE TAX RATE IN THE FUTURE. AND SO WE COULD CALCULATE WHAT, WHAT THAT COULD POTENTIALLY BE ABSENT THOSE OTHER VARIABLES. I'M GLAD YOU SAID THAT AGAIN, BECAUSE THAT MADE ME THINK OF ANOTHER QUESTION. SO IF THE BOND DOES NOT PASS, THE DISTRICT DOES NOT HAVE TO LOWER THE I&S TAX RATE. IT CAN STAY THE SAME. CORRECT. AND THE BOARD WOULD HAVE TO APPROVE THAT EVERY YEAR. THE BOARD APPROVES THAT EVERY YEAR. AND THAT'S BASED ON SO THE YOU KNOW, WE COULD PAY OFF DEBT EARLY AND LOWER OUR TOTAL DEBT. BUT WE COULDN'T USE IT TO LET'S SAY, FOR EXAMPLE THE TECHNOLOGY BOND FAILED. YOU CAN'T USE YOU CAN ONLY USE I&S, TAX RATE MONEY TO PAY DEBT. YOU CAN'T USE IT TO PAY FOR THINGS. SO WE WOULD BE IF THE BOND FAILED, THEN WE WOULD BE LOOKING AT M&O MONEY TO PAY FOR THINGS THAT WE NEED THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN PAID FOR WITH THE BOND, AND THEN WE WOULD BE LOOKING AT WHAT DO WE WANT TO DO ON THE DEBT SIDE? DO WE WANT TO PAY OFF DEBT EARLY OR DO WE WANT TO LOWER THE DEBT TAX RATE? KIM, I JUST WANT TO I THINK A CONVERSATION THAT WE HAD ONE TIME WAS THAT. AND MAYBE I MAY HAVE MISUNDERSTOOD YOU, BUT WE CAN'T USE THE I&S MONEY FOR ANYTHING ELSE OTHER THAN PAYING OFF DEBT. BUT THERE ARE WAYS TO DO IT IS WHAT I WALKED AWAY WITH. THERE ARE WAYS TO DO WHAT? TO USE THAT MONEY FOR SOMETHING ELSE. IN OTHER WORDS, THERE I DON'T REMEMBER WHAT THE EXACT SITUATION WAS, BUT DIDN'T YOU? AND I'M NOT PUTTING WORDS IN YOUR MOUTH. YOU MAY NOT HAVE EVEN SAID. I BET WHAT YOU'RE REMEMBERING IS THAT THERE WE DO HAVE. WE CAN USE SOME OF OUR TIRZ MONEY. YES, TO PAY FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS. IF WE DON'T HAVE AUTHORIZED BOND MONEY. NOW, THAT TIRZ MONEY ONLY GOES SO FAR, SO IT'S NOT NEAR ENOUGH TO PAY FOR THE ENTIRE BOND PROGRAM, RIGHT? BUT IF A BOND WERE TO FAIL AND AND WE HAD SOMETHING BREAK THAT WE ABSOLUTELY HAD TO BUY ASSUMING THAT IT IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD QUALIFY FOR TIRZ EXPENDITURES, WE COULD USE IT. WE COULD USE SOME OF THE TIRZ MONEY BEFORE WE CONSIDER OUR M&O. IF WE DON'T HAVE TIRZ MONEY AVAILABLE, OR IF THE TIRZ MONEY CAN'T BE USED FOR WHATEVER THAT PARTICULAR PROJECT IS, THEN WE WOULD HAVE TO LOOK TO M&O TO PAY FOR IT. THANK YOU. YEAH, I THINK ONE THING WE WOULD WANT TO CALCULATE ALONG WITH THIS, AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS LOOKS LIKE, IS THE COST OF DEFERRING MAINTENANCE. RIGHT. IF IF THE TAX IF THE BOND FAILED AND OVER TIME, DEFINITELY IT MAKES SENSE TO BELIEVE THAT OVER TIME IF WE DIDN'T HAVE A BOND THAT THE TAX RATE WOULD SLOWLY DROP. RIGHT? BUT THEN WHAT WOULD THE COST IN THE FUTURE BE? I JUST HAD AN AIR CONDITIONER GO OUT THIS WEEKEND. RIGHT. AND LUCKILY IT WAS A SMALL LITTLE PART, RIGHT? BUT IF YOU DON'T CLEAN IT, IF YOU DON'T DO THINGS TO IT OVER TIME IT COSTS MORE. [00:35:02] AND THEIR ARE DISTRICTS AROUND US WHO ARE REBUILDING COMPLETE BUILDINGS RIGHT NOW BECAUSE THEY FAILED BOND PROGRAMS. AND SO I THINK THERE'S I THINK WE WANT TO LOOK AT THIS REAL HOLISTICALLY, RIGHT. AND NOT JUST KIND OF SAY, WHAT WOULD THERE BE A THREE CENT DROP IN THE TAX RATE OR A TWO CENT DROP IN THE TAX RATE OR WHATEVER IS WHAT ARE THE LONG TERM CONSEQUENCES OF THAT ALSO? SO THAT THAT'S SOMETHING WE MAY WANT TO MAKE PART OF THE CONVERSATION. JUST TO KIND OF TIE A BOW ON THAT DISCUSSION, I WILL I WILL GO BACK THROUGH THE TAX RATE CALCULATIONS AND SORT OF PLUG IN SOME OF THOSE ASSUMPTIONS AND SEE IF I CAN GET A RANGE FOR YOU, AND THEN I'LL PUT THAT IN HOME BASE. AND IF THAT IF THAT ADDRESSES WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO GET AT, THEN THEN WE CAN TALK ABOUT IT AT A FUTURE PUBLIC MEETING. I WANT TO ADDRESS JUST A COUPLE ITEMS AND STAY ON THIS SLIDE IF WE CAN. MY TAKEAWAY FROM THIS SLIDE IS, I THINK WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS AS TO THE OVERALL PROPERTY TAX BILL, WHATEVER INCREASE THE AVERAGE HOMEOWNER IN FRISCO WOULD EXPERIENCE, ONE FIFTH OF THAT ROUGHLY WOULD BE DUE TO OUR TAX INCREASE. I THINK THAT'S FAIR. YES. I MEAN, I DID THE MATH. IT'S 20.8% OR I'M SORRY, 0.208%. SO ONLY ONE FIFTH OF THAT IS ON THE ISD THE OTHER 4/5 IS RELATED TO APPRAISAL VALUES GOING UP, WHICH WE HAVE NO CONTROL OVER OBVIOUSLY. RIGHT. AND IN WHICH THE LEGISLATURE LAST SESSION TRIED TO ADDRESS, I THINK, FROM SOME OF YOUR EARLIER PRESENTATION THROUGH COMPRESSION. YEAH. THAT LEADS ME TO MY I GUESS THE POINT OF MAKING THIS COMMENT IS, IS THEY COULD DO THAT AGAIN THIS UPCOMING SESSION. CORRECT? THEY COULD. AND SO THAT CERTAINLY GIVEN THAT THERE IS A VALUE INCREASE, YOU KNOW, YEAR OVER YEAR FROM 23 TO 24, ONE WOULD THINK THAT SOME TECHNIQUE, COMPRESSION OR OTHERWISE THROUGH THE LEGISLATIVE MEANS COULD ADDRESS THE OTHER 4/5 OF THE HIGHER BILL GOING UP. THAT'S NOTHING WE CAN CONTROL. CORRECT? CORRECT. THE OTHER PIECE I WANTED TO TALK ON IS AND THIS IS WHERE I LOSE YOU A LITTLE BIT ON ON TIER TWO, PARTICULARLY RELATED TO THE COPPER PENNIES. YEAH. THIS ONE. YES. THAT ONE. OKAY. THE BIGGEST ISSUE I HAVE WITH THIS TIER, WITH THIS VATRE AT ALL, IS THE RECAPTURE PIECE THAT THE AMOUNT OF MONEY WE'RE RAISING VERSUS THE AMOUNT OF MONEY WE'RE SHIPPING AWAY. I THINK THAT'S OBVIOUS. AGAIN, THAT IS ANOTHER LEGISLATIVE THING THAT WE CANNOT CONTROL. I THINK WE'VE BEEN FISCALLY SMART AND NOT, YOU KNOW, MAXIMIZING OUR COPPER PENNIES AND SHIPPING THAT RECAPTURE MONEY AWAY IN PRIOR YEARS. SO THAT'S KUDOS TO YOU GUYS. I WOULD SAY WHAT CAN BE DONE? I KNOW THIS IS A LEGISLATIVE QUESTION, SO THIS IS WHERE I'M GOING WITH THAT. WHAT CAN BE DONE LEGISLATIVELY TO ADJUST THE RECAPTURE PIECE OF THAT SO THAT WE KEEP MORE OF IT. LIKE, IS IT WITHIN THE LEGISLATIVE PURVIEW? COULD THE LEGISLATURE LET ME ASK IT ANOTHER WAY? COULD THE LEGISLATURE GO INTO SESSION THIS SPRING, DO SOMETHING WITH THE RECAPTURE CALCULATION ON THE COPPER PENNIES SO THAT OF OUR $19 MILLION WE GET TO, WE ONLY SHIP AWAY FOUR OF THAT RATHER THAN EIGHT OF THAT. SO. AND HAS THAT BEEN DISCUSSED IN THE PAST? THEY ABSOLUTELY COULD DO SOMETHING TO CHANGE THE FORMULA AS IT RELATES TO RECAPTURE. THAT IS A WHAT THAT MIGHT LOOK LIKE IS PROBABLY A LOADED QUESTION, BECAUSE THE WHOLE NATURE OF THE STATE FUNDING FORMULA IS BASED ON ESSENTIALLY EQUITY ACROSS THE STATE. SO YOU HAVE SOME DISTRICTS THAT ARE PROPERTY WEALTHY, THAT IF YOU DIDN'T HAVE A RECAPTURE MECHANISM IN PLACE, RIGHT, YOUR DISTRICTS THAT ARE PROPERTY WEALTHY WHICH DISTRICTS DON'T NECESSARILY CONTROL HOW PROPERTY WEALTHY THEY ARE. DISTRICTS THAT ARE PROPERTY WEALTHY CAN GENERATE MORE THROUGH LOCAL TAX DOLLARS THAN DISTRICTS THAT ARE PROPERTY POOR. AND SO THE RECAPTURE MECHANISM THAT'S BEEN IN PLACE IN THE FUNDING FORMULA IS MEANT TO EQUALIZE THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT DISTRICTS CAN HAVE SO THAT YOU DON'T HAVE DISTRICTS THAT YOU DON'T HAVE, YOU KNOW, HAVES AND HAVE NOTS, ESSENTIALLY, I MEAN. BUT THERE IS THERE ARE THINGS THAT THEY CAN DO TO ADJUST RECAPTURE. IT'S JUST A PIECE OF THE FORMULA. SO THEY COULD RAISE THE GUARANTEED YIELD ON THE COPPER PENNIES. AND THAT WOULD ALLOW US TO KEEP MORE OF THAT TAX REVENUE. RIGHT NOW, I THINK IT'S SET AT 80% OF THE BASIC ALLOTMENT. [00:40:02] IT'S JUST INDEXED. SO IF THE BASIC ALLOTMENT GOES UP, THAT INDEX IS STILL 80%. SO WE GET TO KEEP MORE MONEY, BUT THE PROPORTION DOESN'T CHANGE. OKAY. AND THAT'S WHY WHEN I, WHEN I THINK YOU AND MR. LOWE, THERE WAS A COMMENT THAT THERE WAS NO WAY OUT FOR FROM RECAPTURE. I'M LIKE UNDER THE CURRENT FORMULA. YES. HOLD ON. YEAH. THERE'S NO WAY FOR US TO DO THAT, RIGHT. THERE IS A WAY FOR AUSTIN TO DO THAT. CORRECT. AND SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT'S AWARE TO PEOPLE LISTENING HERE IS THAT IS THAT THERE IS A WAY TO REDUCE THIS EIGHT OUT OF THIS $19 MILLION FROM GOING ELSEWHERE. IT JUST ISN'T ON THIS BOARD. YOU'RE RIGHT. OKAY. IF THAT WAS CHANGED WHEN LET'S SAY HYPOTHETICALLY, THAT THAT DID GET SOME LEGS AND THERE WAS SOME ITERATION OF THAT. AND I AGREE, THERE'S A LOT OF GOOD IDEAS THAT CAN MATERIALIZE IN THE SPRING TO THAT IDEA, AND WHO KNOWS WHAT THAT WOULD LOOK LIKE? WHEN WOULD THAT TAKE EFFECT? DEPENDS ON IT DEPENDS ON THE THE BILL. TYPICALLY WE'VE SEEN PROPERTY TAX LEGISLATION OR CHANGES TO THE FORMULA TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY. OR, YOU KNOW, BEGINNING WITH SEPTEMBER, THE SEPTEMBER 1ST AFTER THE LEGISLATIVE SESSION ENDS. RIGHT. SOMETIMES DEPENDING JUST DEPENDING UPON THE CHANGE, IF IT'S ADMINISTRATIVELY GOING TO TAKE TEA A LONG TIME TO PUT IT IN PLACE, IT MIGHT BE EFFECTIVE A YEAR LATER, BUT TYPICALLY WE'VE SEEN IT TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY. OKAY. THERE'S OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. I I'VE HAD DISCUSSIONS WITH I MEAN, IT MIGHT BE SELF-SERVING. THIS WHOLE ROBIN HOOD THING. I AM JUST NOT WITH IT. YEAH, MAYBE IT'S BECAUSE I LIVE IN A PROPERTY RICH AREA, BUT I JUST HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT. AND I'VE TALKED TO A LOT OF LEGISLATORS, LEGISLATORS WHO ARE NOT EVEN IN OUR AREA. AND IT SEEMS LIKE THAT WOULD BE A HARD NUT TO CRACK TO GET RID OF IT. HOWEVER, SOME OF THEM SEEM OPEN TO AND WHO KNOWS WHAT HAPPENED, BUT OPEN IT. MAYBE DOING SOMETHING, ADJUSTING IT, NOT DOING AWAY WITH ROBIN HOOD, BUT TO ADJUST IT. THAT'S JUST A COMMENTARY ON WHAT MR. HILL WAS SAYING. ME? I'M REFLEXIVELY AGAINST RAISING TAXES. I HEAR THAT AT FIRST MY FIRST THOUGHT IS, NO, I DON'T WANT TO DO IT. WE CAN WORK OUT SOMETHING. AND I'M ABOUT ALL KINDS OF FIXES, AND THERE ARE CERTAIN REASONS I WOULD BE MORE OPEN TO IT. LIKE IF WE WERE TALKING ABOUT, SAY, IF WE WANT TO MAKE OUR TEACHERS PAID MORE THAN WHAT THE AVERAGE TEACHER IN THE AREA IS PAYING, I'D BE OPEN TO SOMETHING LIKE THAT. BUT OUTSIDE OF THINGS LIKE THAT, THE THINGS I WOULD LIKE TO LOOK AT FIRST ARE SOME OF THE VERY GOOD IDEAS THAT THE IST PRESENTED TO THE BOARD ABOUT SAVING MONEY, ABOUT FIGURING OUT WHY PEOPLE ARE LEAVING. BECAUSE THE FACT OF THE MATTER, IF WE GOT ALL THOSE PEOPLE, WHICH WE PROBABLY NEVER WOULD BACK IN THE DISTRICT WE WOULD BE ON BUDGET, WE WOULDN'T HAVE TO RAISE TAXES. ISN'T THAT MORE OR LESS TRUE? BECAUSE I DON'T THINK I'M FOLLOWING YOU. I DON'T I DON'T THINK IF OUR TURNOVER WAS LOWER, WE WOULD BE WE WOULD HAVE A MORE BALANCED BUDGET. THE STUDENTS I'M TALKING ABOUT THE. OH, STUDENTS. I'M SORRY. I'M TALKING ABOUT. I'M SORRY. LET ME MAKE MYSELF CLEAR. I'M TALKING ABOUT THE STUDENTS THAT WE'VE LOST TO PRIVATE SCHOOLS, TO CHARTER SCHOOLS, HOME SCHOOL. OKAY. NO. IF WE I THINK OUR ENROLLMENT AT ONE OF YOU IS GOING TO HAVE TO HELP ME REMEMBER THE TOTAL DECREASE IN ENROLLMENT FROM 2023 TO 2024, BUT IT WAS ABOUT 5%. OKAY. GO AHEAD. IF WE IF WE HAD IF IT WAS LIKE 800 KIDS, I THINK WE HAVE 5% OF THE KIDS THAT WERE [INAUDIBLE] 350 KIDS. SO 350 KIDS, IF WE HAD THOSE KIDS STILL IN THE DISTRICT. WE THAT WOULD NOT THAT WOULD NOT GENERATE ENOUGH REVENUE TO TO BALANCE OUR BUDGET. RIGHT. LET ME ASK YOU. MY UNDERSTANDING WAS THAT WE HAD ABOUT TEN TIMES THAT AMOUNT OF KIDS THAT WOULD BE ELIGIBLE TO GO INTO BE IN FISD YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS THAT THAT LIVE IN OUR BOUNDARIES THAT GO TO PRIVATE. EXACTLY WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. OKAY. AND IF WE WERE ABLE AND LIKE I SAID, WE NEVER GET THEM ALL BACK. BUT IF WE WERE TO PURSUE THAT, IF WE WERE TO PURSUE OTHER STRATEGIES, IT JUST SEEMS SO MUCH BETTER. I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. OKAY. I REMEMBER THAT CONVERSATION NOW. BEFORE YOU BEFORE YOU DO THAT, I KNOW THAT WE I KNOW THAT THERE'S A DISTINCT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN STUDENTS THAT LEFT THE DISTRICT TO GO TO OTHER TO PURSUE OTHER INSTITUTIONS. [00:45:01] BUT WE CAN'T ACCOUNT FOR STUDENTS THAT WERE NEVER HERE THAT CHOSE PRIVATE OR CHARTER. AND SO I THINK THAT'S HOW THAT'S THE NUMBER DECREASE. SO YOU'RE PROBABLY LOOKING AT JUST THE KIDS THAT LIVE IN OUR BOUNDARIES THAT MAY NOT HAVE POSSIBLY EVER ATTENDED THAT. THAT IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, MADAM PRESIDENT. AND WHAT I WOULD SAY IS I WOULD DO SO MANY THINGS BEFORE RAISING TAXES. LIKE I SAID, I'M REFLEXIVELY AGAINST IT, BUT I'M NOT TOTALLY AGAINST IT. YEAH. AFTER WE'VE EXHAUSTED, AFTER WE'VE LOOKED AT THAT, WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE LEAVING AFTER WE'VE CONSIDERED SOME OTHER THINGS TO RAISE MONEY? COREY SENT ME, AND I KNOW THIS IS JUST A DROP IN THE A BUTTON IN THE BUCKET, BUT HE SENT ME THE MONEY ON HOW MUCH WE'RE MAKING OFF OF OUR TENNIS. YEAH. AND I WAS LIKE, ARE YOU SERIOUS? AND SO I JUST THINK WE COULD BE SO MUCH MORE CREATIVE IN TRYING TO RAISE THE MONEY. THE OTHER THING, AND IT'S NOT REALLY A KNOCK ON THE ADMINISTRATION, AND IT'S JUST THE WAY YOU DO THINGS. I'VE ONLY BEEN HERE A COUPLE OF YEARS, BUT, YOU KNOW, WHEN I BROUGHT UP THE FACT THAT WE KIND OF OVERSPENT ON SOFTWARE AND THERE'S THINGS THAT WE OVERSPENT ON. IF WE COULD JUST AND THAT'S NOT BECAUSE OF ANY, YOU KNOW, BODY WANTING TO DO THAT. BUT IF WE TIGHTEN UP THINGS LIKE THAT, BUT WE DON'T EVEN KNOW WHERE WE NEED TO TIGHTEN UP ON AND WE NEED TO LOOK AT THINGS LIKE THAT. I JUST WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW MY POSITION. WE NEED TO TIGHTEN UP ON THINGS LIKE THAT BEFORE WE GO TO RAISE TAXES. AND WE'RE NOT EVEN GETTING ALL THE TAXES. WE'RE ONLY GETTING TWO THIRDS OF IT. I JUST THAT JUST GRATES ME SO. SO BEFORE YOU GO, OKAY. JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE MAINTAINING, WE'RE STAYING ON TRACK WITH THE AGENDA FOR TODAY. EVERYTHING THAT YOU SHARED, MR. LOWE, IS VALID. I THINK THAT WE CAN, THROUGH OUR WORKSHOPS AND THINGS THAT WE HAVE TASKED OUR STAFF TO COME UP WITH THIS YEAR TO HELP US GET SOME OF THE ANSWERS TO YOUR QUESTIONS. BUT FOR TODAY LET'S PLEASE KEEP OUR CONVERSATION ON THE AGENDA. I DO, I DO WANT TO ADDRESS THE BUDGET A LITTLE BIT IN RELATION TO THE TAX RATE, BECAUSE I DO WANT TO REMIND YOU GUYS, I DON'T HAVE THOSE SLIDES WITH ME. BUT AT THE END OF THE BUDGET PROCESS THIS SPRING, WE TALKED ABOUT KIND OF THE LIST OF THINGS THAT WE WOULD BE LOOKING AT OVER THE COURSE OF THIS YEAR TO MAKE CHANGES TO, TO GET BACK TO A BALANCED BUDGET. ABSENT ANYTHING COMING OUT OF THE LEGISLATURE. AND THE TWO BIG THINGS ON THAT LIST THAT WOULD GET US NOT EVEN ALL THE WAY, BUT A GOOD PORTION OF THE WAY THERE WOULD BE TO LOOK AT USING SOME OF OUR TIRZ FUNDS, REDOING THAT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY, AND USING SOME OF OUR TIRZ FUNDS TO HELP PAY FOR THE COST OF OPERATING OUR FACILITIES, WHICH WHICH THAT IS IN PROGRESS. THAT WORK IS IN PROGRESS RIGHT NOW. WE EXPECT TO HAVE THAT ALL SQUARED AWAY BY SEPTEMBER, OCTOBER AT THE LATEST, SO THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO USE THAT MONEY TO OFFSET THIS YEAR'S EXPENSES. I ANTICIPATE THAT WE'RE TALKING NO MORE THAN $15 MILLION ON TO THAT END. RIGHT. AND REMEMBER, WE ADOPTED A $30 MILLION DEFICIT. THIS THEN IS THE SECOND BIG CHUNK. AND THIS WOULD BE, YOU KNOW, $11.5 MILLION OF THE $30 MILLION THAT WE WOULD NEED TO GET TO GET TOWARDS, TO GET TO A BALANCED BUDGET. THE OTHER THINGS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT, YOU KNOW, OPENING ENROLLMENT THAT WOULD GENERATE, COULD POTENTIALLY GENERATE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF MONEY. BUT WHETHER OR NOT HOW MANY KIDS WE ACTUALLY ENROLL THROUGH OPEN ENROLLMENT, IF THAT BECOMES SOMETHING THAT WE DO, YOU KNOW, WE CAN ONLY ESTIMATE. AND SO THAT'S NOT A GUARANTEE. IT DEFINITELY WOULD HELP OUR BUDGET. IT'S JUST NOT A GUARANTEE. AND THEN, YOU KNOW, BEYOND THAT WE'RE TALKING CHANGES, MAJOR CHANGES TO PROGRAMS AND SERVICES THAT WE OFFER IN ORDER TO HAVE ANY KIND OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE BUDGET. I THE BUDGET OWNERS SO PRINCIPALS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS SCRUB THEIR BUDGETS CONSTANTLY, AND I HAVE NOT LET THEM STOP SCRUBBING THEIR BUDGETS PASSED THE BUDGET ADOPTION PROCESS. SO WE STILL TALK ABOUT IT ALL THE TIME. WE'RE STILL COMBING THROUGH, YOU KNOW, WHAT ARE WE SPENDING AND LOOKING FOR WAYS TO SCRIMP AND SAVE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. BUT BECAUSE OF THE SIZE OF THE THE DEFICIT, WHICH IS MOSTLY DUE TO INFLATION AND COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENTS, RIGHT. LIKE THERE'S YOU CAN'T WE CAN'T SCRIMP AND SAVE OUR WAY OUT OF A $30 MILLION BUDGET DEFICIT. WE HAVE TO LOOK AT MAKING SOME MAJOR CHANGES TO OUR EXPECTATIONS. [00:50:04] SO I MEAN THAT THAT'S JUST JUST TO REMIND THE BOARD KIND OF THE CONVERSATIONS THAT WE HAD BACK IN THE SPRING AND, AND WHERE WE ARE HERE. THE ONLY OTHER THING THAT I KIND OF WANT TO REMIND YOU GUYS OF IS THESE AND THIS KIND OF GOES TO SOMETHING MR. HILL SAID A MINUTE AGO. THESE PENNIES IN THE TAX RATE WERE AT ONE POINT APPROVED BY OUR COMMUNITY. WE HAD TO REDUCE THAT RATE BECAUSE OF A CHANGE IN THE STATE'S FUNDING FORMULA BECAUSE OF A LEGISLATIVE CHANGE. SO AT ONE POINT, THE COMMUNITY HAD APPROVED ALL 17 ENRICHMENT PENNIES, BACK IN 2018. IN 2019, THE STATE CAME AND ESSENTIALLY TOOK THREE AND A HALF OF THOSE PENNIES AWAY FROM US. AND WE MADE A COMMITMENT TO NOT GOING BACK TO THE VOTERS, TO ASK FOR THEM BACK UNTIL WE FELT LIKE WE ABSOLUTELY NEEDED TO. AND SO THAT WE'RE AT THAT POINT NOW. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE JUST WANT TO MAKE A COUPLE OF POINTS, ONE IS WITH RESPECT TO THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS THAT MR. LOWE HAS MENTIONED. SO ONE THING THAT I'M THINKING IS MAYBE YOU CAN CORRECT ME IS IF WE HAVE SOME OF THE STUDENTS BACK IN OUR DISTRICT OR EVEN IF THROUGH THE OPEN ENROLLMENT, THEN THERE ARE ALSO COSTS RELATED TO THE ADDING PROGRAMING FOR THOSE KIDS. BECAUSE ADDING A STUDENT DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY INCREASE JUST THE REVENUE, BUT THERE IS A COST INCREASE TOO. YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. THERE IS A NUMBER OF STUDENTS THAT WE COULD ABSORB INTO OUR CLASSROOMS AS THEY SIT TODAY BY, YOU KNOW, ADDING ONE STUDENT TO A CLASS SIZE OR SOMETHING. BUT THEN WHEN YOU REACH A CERTAIN POINT, YOUR COSTS START TO GO UP AS WELL. EXACTLY. IT'S A SMALL, YOU KNOW, IT HAS TO BE A SMALL BALANCE. AND THEN THE OTHER ONE IS, YOU KNOW, I APPRECIATE YOU KNOW, EVEN I DON'T LIKE ANY TAX RATE INCREASES. NOBODY. RIGHT, EITHER. SO THE THING IS, YOU KNOW, LIKE WHEN THE CHIEF STUDENT OFFICER IS LEAVING, THEN, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A EFFORT MADE IN TO ENSURE THAT THE THE WORK IS BEING DISTRIBUTED AMONGST OTHERS. SO I STRONGLY ENCOURAGE YOU JUST MENTIONED THAT, YOU KNOW, THE DISTRICT IS DOING EFFORTS TO ENSURE THAT THE COST REDUCTION EFFORT IS CONTINUING, AND I STRONGLY ENCOURAGE TO LOOK INTO ALL DEPARTMENTS LIKE MR. LOWE HAS MENTIONED ABOUT THE SOFTWARE, YOU KNOW, ANY AUDITING THAT CAN BE, YOU KNOW, CONTINUED, IF YOU ARE ALREADY DOING, THAT'S GOOD, BUT IF YOU CAN PUT MORE EFFORT IN THOSE AREAS AND THEN LOOK FOR OPPORTUNITIES, THAT WILL BE GOOD. I KNOW WE PROBABLY HAVE TO MOVE ON TO THE BOND HERE SOON, RIGHT? YEAH. ARE WE OKAY ON TIME? OKAY. SO SOMETHING THAT MR. HILL SAID MADE ME THINK OF SOMETHING AS IT RELATES TO THE RECAPTURE SO. SO FOR US TO GET $11.5 MILLION IN THIS VATRE THAT WE CAN USE FOR OUR TEACHER INCREASES. CORRECT? WE HAVE TO RAISE $19.5 MILLION BECAUSE $8 OF THAT MILLION GOES TO THE STATE. SO I THINK JUST KIND OF BACK TO MY POINT EARLIER AROUND THE COMMUNICATION TO THE COMMUNITY, AROUND HERE'S HOW MUCH IT'S GOING TO COST ON AVERAGE BASED ON THIS HOME PRICE OR HOME VALUE, I SHOULD SAY, I THINK A COMPONENT OF THAT SHOULD ALSO BE WE HAVE TO RAISE OUR PHRASES ISN'T THE RIGHT WORD, BUT WE HAVE TO GENERATE. THAT'S PROBABLY A BETTER WAY TO SAY IT $19 MILLION IN ORDER TO GET $11 (MILLION) BECAUSE WE HAVE TO GIVE EIGHT TO THE STATE. I THINK THAT'S AN IMPORTANT PIECE FOR PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND BECAUSE I THINK THEY LOOK TO US RIGHT ON THIS BOARD AND AS A LEADERSHIP TEAM OF THE ONES WHO ARE MAKING THESE DECISIONS. BUT I THINK THE RECAPTURE PIECE IS NOT A VERY WELL UNDERSTOOD PIECE THAT WE HAVE TO GIVE THAT MONEY TO THE STATE. SO IF WE ASKED FOR $11 MILLION, WHICH IS WHAT WE NEED, AND YOU APPROVE THAT, THAT DOES NOT GET US TO THE GOAL OF GIVING THE TEACHERS THE RAISE THAT WE THINK WE NEED TO GIVE THEM. SO I THINK THAT'S AN IMPORTANT PIECE BECAUSE I GET A LOT OF QUESTIONS AROUND, YOU KNOW, THAT TO PEOPLE WHO JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND THE RECAPTURE. AND IT'S CONFUSING, RIGHT? YEAH. AND WE HAVE NO WE HAVE NO AUTHORITY OVER THAT. BUT I JUST THINK THAT SHOULD BE PART OF THE COMMUNICATION. AND THAT KIND OF LEADS ME TO MY SECOND PART THAT I WANTED TO MENTION. I THINK I MENTIONED THIS LAST TIME WE DISCUSSED THIS A WEEK OR TWO AGO, BUT I DO THINK A COMMUNICATION PLAN TO THE COMMUNITY BEFORE AUGUST 19TH IS IMPORTANT, BECAUSE THAT IS AT LEAST THEIR FIRST CHANCE TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK. WELL, I GUESS NOT THEIR FIRST CHANCE, BUT THEIR LAST CHANCE TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK TO THIS BOARD BEFORE THIS BOARD VOTES WHETHER OR NOT TO ADVANCE. I REALIZE THEY'LL HAVE A CHANCE AFTER, BUT AT THAT POINT, IT'S OUT OF THIS BOARD'S HANDS. [00:55:04] IT'S IN THE COMMUNITY'S HANDS. SO I THINK JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE BEING AS TRANSPARENT AS POSSIBLE TO PUT THIS INFORMATION OUT THERE, I MEAN, PUTTING THE NEWSPAPERS GREAT AND PUTTING IT AS AN AGENDA ITEM IS GREAT. BUT I THINK SOME MORE PROACTIVE COMMUNICATION, WHETHER IT BE AN EMAIL, SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS, COMBINATION OF THE OF THE TWO OTHER MECHANISMS THAT WE HAVE TO COMMUNICATE, PUTTING SOMETHING ON THE WEBSITE SO THAT PEOPLE KNOW SO THAT IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO COME ADDRESS THE BOARD ON THIS MATTER, THEY CAN DO THAT ON THE 19TH. OH, MANDY'S NOT NOT HERE THIS MORNING. BUT I KNOW THAT COMMUNICATIONS PUT OUT A STORY ALREADY ON THE BOND PROPOSAL. AND SO I'LL FOLLOW UP WITH THEM, TOO, ABOUT THE THE TAX RATE PIECE. GREAT. THANK YOU. AND, KIMBERLY. JUST SO THAT I KNOW WE WERE JUST DISCUSSING THE COMMUNICATION PIECE OF IT, IT MAY BE HELPFUL TO JUST LET THE BOARD KNOW EXACTLY WHAT YOU ALL'S. WE DON'T WANT TO, WE DON'T WANT TO SIT AND TELL YOU GUYS HOW TO DO AND WHAT TO DO. WE WANT YOU TO JUST BE ABLE TO TELL US WHAT YOU'RE, HOW YOU'RE GOING TO IMPLEMENT WHAT WE'RE SUGGESTING OR WHAT OUR RECOMMENDATIONS ARE. I, I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK FOR MANDY, BUT I KNOW SHE HAS A VERY ROBUST AND WELL THOUGHT OUT PLAN. SO I'LL JUST THE PROCESS. JUST, YOU KNOW, SO THAT EVERYONE IS REMINDED THIS BOARD HAS NEVER EXPERIENCED A VATRE OR A BOND. AND SO A LOT OF INFORMATION, EVEN IF YOU FEEL LIKE IT'S TOO MUCH FOR US TO DIGEST, WE'LL BE BETTER THAN LIMITED INFORMATION. THANK YOU. OKAY. I WANT TO GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON TO THE BOND. I'M STILL HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THE TAX RATE, YOU KNOW, AS WE GO THROUGH THE REST OF THIS WORKSHOP, BUT I HERE WE GO. I DID ASK ESTHER TO COME AND DO SORT OF TAKE A STEP BACK FROM WHERE WE WERE LAST WEEK AND DO JUST LIKE, A KIND OF HIGH LEVEL BONDS 101 FOR YOU GUYS. JUST BECAUSE THE THE PROCESS FOR A BOND ELECTION I KNOW IS NEW TO ALL OF YOU. SO, ESTHER, TAKE IT AWAY. THERE YOU GO. SO JUST AS A PREVIEW, I AM NOT AN ACCOUNTANT, AND SO THIS WILL BE SOLELY VERY SIMPLE PROCESS PRESENTATION. AND HOPEFULLY WE'LL BE HELPFUL TO YOU ALL AS A BOARD WHO HAS NEVER BEEN THROUGH A BOND AND ALSO HELPFUL FOR THE COMMUNITY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THE PROCESS OVERALL LOOKS LIKE. SO AGAIN, THIS IS JUST THE BASICS OF WHAT A BOND ELECTION LOOKS LIKE AND THE PROCESS FOR AFTER A BOND ALSO. SO BOND ELECTION STEPS ARE REALLY MULTI. THE FIRST THING WE DO IS ASSESS DISTRICT NEEDS THAT STARTS WITH THE ADMINISTRATION AND ALSO INVOLVES COMMUNITY INPUT. ONCE WE'VE GOT A PRELIMINARY LIST OF DISTRICT NEEDS, WE'LL RECEIVE COMMUNITY IMPACT ON THAT. AND THEN THE ITEMS HIGHLIGHTED IN ORANGE OR ORANGE-Y RED ARE THE ITEMS THAT THE BOARD ACTUALLY HAS TO VOTE ON. SO ONCE WE HAVE THE COMMUNITY INPUT AND HAVE ASSESSED DISTRICT NEEDS, THE BOARD WILL NEED TO DETERMINE PRIORITIES AND THE TYPES OF PROJECTS. AND WHAT THAT WILL BE REFLECTED IN IS THE DRAFTED PROPOSED PROPOSITIONS THAT THE BOARD WILL VOTE TO APPROVE. AND THEN ONCE WE HAVE THE PROPOSITIONS TOGETHER, WE WILL ORDER A BOND ELECTION ON THOSE PROPOSITIONS. THEN WE GO OUT AND EDUCATE THE COMMUNITY ON OUR BOND PROGRAM. WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE, WHAT THE DISTRICT NEEDS ARE, AND HOW WE CAME UP WITH THE PROPOSITIONS THAT THEY'RE VOTING ON. WE ACTUALLY HOLD AN ELECTION, AND THEN AFTER AN ELECTION, IF THE BONDS ARE APPROVED, WE ISSUE THE BONDS THAT WERE APPROVED BY THE ELECTORATE. SO ALL OF THIS IS THE STEPS THAT GO ON BEFORE THE ELECTION. AND THEN THE NEXT SLIDE ARE ALL THE THINGS THAT HAPPEN AFTER THE BOND ELECTION TAKES PLACE. SO I KNOW THERE WERE A LOT OF QUESTIONS AT THE LAST WORKSHOP ABOUT ALL THESE KIND OF ITEMS, AND I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU ALL UNDERSTAND THAT A LOT OF THE SPECIFICS ABOUT SITE BASED PROJECTS, SCOPES, SCHEDULES, PROPOSALS FROM ARCHITECTS AND CONTRACTORS, PROVIDER SELECTION AND CONTRACTING WITH THOSE PEOPLE, NEGOTIATING THE PRICES THAT WE'LL PAY TO OUR ARCHITECTS, ETC. ALL THOSE THINGS HAPPEN POST BOND ELECTION, AFTER THE ELECTORATE HAS APPROVED THE PROPOSITIONS THAT WE'RE MOVING FORWARD WITH. THE BIG THING I WANT TO HIGHLIGHT TO YOU IS THE LAST ORANGE-Y RED OPTION AT THE VERY BOTTOM IS THAT THE BOARD'S RESPONSIBILITY IS TO CONTINUE TO MONITOR DISTRICT NEEDS AND POTENTIALLY REPURPOSE FUNDS WITHIN VOTER APPROVAL. [01:00:04] SO WHAT THIS MEANS IS THAT IF WE HAVE A PROPOSITION THAT'S BEEN APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC, AND AS WE'RE WORKING THROUGH THE PROJECTS, WE'RE MAYBE UNDER BUDGET ON A PARTICULAR PROJECT, OR IT COMES UP THAT A DIFFERENT BUILDING HAS A REALLY HIGH NEED, AND WE NEED TO REPURPOSE FUNDS THAT WE WERE ORIGINALLY PLANNING TO USE HERE TO GO OVER TO THIS BUILDING. IF WE HAVE A BROAD APPROVAL FROM THE VOTERS AS TO A PARTICULAR PROPOSITION, THE BOARD HAS THE AUTHORITY WITHIN THAT VOTER APPROVAL TO MOVE SOME FUNDS TO ADDRESS THOSE CONCERNS. SO IT'S A VERY IMPORTANT COMPONENT OF WHAT YOUR RESPONSIBILITY AS A BOARD IS, IS TO MONITOR SPENDING AFTER THE BOARD APPROVES, AFTER THE VOTERS APPROVE THE BONDS, TO SEE IF SOME OF THE FUNDS NEED TO BE REDISTRIBUTED TO MEET THE DISTRICT NEEDS OVER TIME. BECAUSE A BOND PROGRAM IS SOMETHING THAT IS CONTEMPLATING USE OF FUNDS OVER A VERY LONG PERIOD OF TIME, AND DISTRICT NEEDS MAY CHANGE OVER THAT PERIOD OF TIME, AND THE BOARD'S RESPONSIBILITY IS TO MONITOR THAT AND MAKE ADJUSTMENTS AS NEEDED, SO LONG AS THAT FITS WITHIN THE VOTER APPROVAL. SO WHERE CAN YOU FIND THE LAW ON BONDS? IT'S IN A WHOLE LOT OF PLACES. BONDS TOUCH ON BOTH STATE AND FEDERAL LAW, AND I'VE JUST LISTED A FEW OF THE BIG ONES HERE. BIG ONES IS CHAPTER 45 OF THE TEXAS EDUCATION CODE. THERE'S ALSO THE TEXAS ELECTION CODE, WHICH GOVERNS HOW THE BONDS ARE PUT TOGETHER. WE HAVE THE TEXAS TAX CODE AND PROPERTY CODES, THE GOVERNMENT CODE, ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, AND THEN AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL, WE HAVE THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE. SO THE TAXES AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL AND THEN SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE CODE AND SEC RULES ALSO APPLY TO BOND ISSUANCE. THIS IS WHY WE ALWAYS RECOMMEND GETTING BOND COUNCIL. BECAUSE IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC PRACTICE OF LAW HAVING TO DEAL WITH BONDS AND THE COMPLICATED NATURE OF THE INTERSECTION BETWEEN STATE AND FEDERAL LAW AT THE BOND LEVEL. AND SO WE WOULD ALWAYS RECOMMEND GETTING BOND COUNCIL WHEN WE'RE TAKING ON A MAJOR BOND PROJECT LIKE THIS. SO WHAT IS A BOND GENERALLY? THE DEFINITION IS IN THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, IT SAYS AN INSTRUMENT INCLUDING A BOND CERTIFICATE, NOTE OR OTHER TYPE OF OBLIGATION AUTHORIZED TO BE ISSUED BY AN ISSUER UNDER A STATUTE. IN LAY TERMS, WHAT THAT REALLY MEANS IS AN INSTRUMENT, IS A DOCUMENT OR CONTRACT, AND AN OBLIGATION IS A DEBT TO A LENDER. SO WHAT WE THINK ABOUT WHEN WE THINK ABOUT A BOND, WE'RE REALLY THINKING ABOUT SORT OF A MORTGAGE THAT THE DISTRICT IS TAKING OUT. IT IS A DEBT TAKEN OUT FOR A LARGE PURCHASE, TYPICALLY RELATED TO REAL PROPERTY THAT MEANS LAND OR A BUILDING, AND THEN PAID BACK TO THE LENDER OVER A SET PERIOD OF TIME. THE LEGISLATION DEFINES THAT TIME PERIOD FOR A BOND REPAYMENT AS BETWEEN 3 AND 40 YEARS FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS, AND THERE IS INTEREST ON THAT LOAN THAT WE WILL NEED TO PAY OUT OF OUR S&I FUNDS THAT KIM MENTIONED EARLIER. SO WHAT CAN BOND MONEY PAY FOR? THE TEXAS EDUCATION CODE COVERS THIS UNDER SECTION 45.001, THERE'S A SPECIFIC LIST OF WHAT BONDS CAN PAY FOR. THE BIGGEST AND MOST COMMONLY UNDERSTOOD THING IS BUYING PROPERTY FOR SCHOOL BUILDINGS AND SPENDING MONEY TO BUILD THOSE SCHOOL BUILDINGS. BUT IT ALSO INCLUDES REFINANCING PROPERTY, JUST LIKE YOU CAN DO A REFINANCED HOME LOAN IF YOU HAVE A MORTGAGE AND YOU NEED TO DO A MAJOR PROJECT ON A HOME. IT ALSO INCLUDES PURCHASING NEW SCHOOL BUSSES OR RETROFITTING THOSE SCHOOL BUSSES TO MEET NEW SAFETY NEEDS. AND IT ALSO INCLUDES SOME KINDS OF SAFETY AND SECURITY AND TECHNOLOGY THAT WE MIGHT NEED FOR SECURITY PURPOSES. AND THIS IS A BIG ONE. WHAT CAN BOND MONEY NOT PAY FOR? OKAY, SO ALL THE THINGS THAT WE THINK ABOUT THAT FALL UNDER THE M&O SIDE OF THE TAX RATE THAT KIM TALKED ABOUT ARE THINGS THAT CANNOT BE COVERED BY A BOND. TALKING ABOUT SALARIES, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, UTILITIES, CURRICULUM MATERIALS, SCHOOL SUPPLIES, ALL THE THINGS THAT GO INTO OPERATIONS OF OUR DAY TO DAY WORKINGS AS A SCHOOL DISTRICT CANNOT COME FROM BOND FUNDS. OUR OPERATION MONEY HAS TO BE COMING FROM THAT OTHER SIDE, WHICH IS THE M&O SIDE OF THE TAX RATE WHICH IS TARGETED BY THE VATRE. CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG. OKAY. OKAY. SO WHY WOULD WE GO WITH A BOND VERSUS USING OTHER FUNDS THAT WE'VE RAISED FROM OUR M&O TAX RATE? IT'S REALLY ALL ABOUT TIMING. SO AS SOON AS THE VOTERS APPROVE A BOND, IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT WE IMMEDIATELY INCUR DEBT. WE ONLY INCUR DEBT AS THOSE BONDS ARE SOLD. SO ONCE THE VOTERS APPROVE, WE CAN SPACE OUT WHEN WE ACTUALLY SELL BONDS AND WHEN WE INCUR DEBT. THAT ALLOWS US TO PLAN OUT OUR BUDGET OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME AND PLAN OUT, WHEN ARE WE GOING TO START TAKING ON THIS MAJOR PROJECT VERSUS THAT MAJOR PROJECT, AND HOW ARE WE GOING TO PAY FOR THINGS IN OUR BUDGET. [01:05:02] IT ALLOWS US TO SPREAD OUT PROJECT COSTS OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME, TO PLAN AHEAD BASED ON OUR NEEDS, AND TO BUILD OR FIX WITHOUT IMPACTING OUR OPERATIONS. RIGHT. WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO CONTINUE DOING THE WORK OF EDUCATING OUR STUDENTS. ALL THE THINGS WE HAD ON THAT PREVIOUS SLIDE THAT WE COULDN'T PAY FOR OUT OF BOND MONEY WITHOUT SACRIFICING DOING THE MAJOR PROJECTS THAT NEED TO BE DONE, FIXING THINGS, UPDATING THINGS, MAKING SURE OUR TECHNOLOGY AND SECURITY ARE MOVING ALONG WITH THE TIMES. THOSE ARE MAJOR EXPENSES THAT WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO TAKE ON WITHOUT IMPACTING OUR FUNCTION IN TERMS OF EDUCATING OUR STUDENTS. SO HOW TO BOND PROPOSITIONS APPEAR ON THE BALLOT. THE LEGISLATURE HAS MADE SURE THAT WE CAN'T HIDE THE BALL. OKAY, SO THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF WORK DONE BY THE LEGISLATURE IN RECENT YEARS TO ORGANIZE HOW WE ACTUALLY PLACE THINGS ON THE BALLOT FOR VOTERS TO SEE. IT USED TO BE THAT SCHOOL DISTRICTS WOULD JUST PUT ONE BIG PROPOSITION ON THE BALLOT, AND THE VOTERS WOULD JUST VOTE ON THAT ONE PROPOSITION, AND THEN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT COULD DECIDE IF THEY WERE GOING TO SPEND THAT MONEY ON A NEW SCHOOL BUILDING OR A GYMNASIUM, OR IF THEY WANTED TO SPEND IT ON A PLAYGROUND OR ON A $50,000 PERSON STADIUM FOR FOOTBALL, THAT IS NO LONGER THE CASE. THE LEGISLATURE NOW REQUIRES THAT WE HAVE SEPARATE ITEMS AS DIFFERENT KINDS OF PROPOSITIONS, DEPENDING ON WHAT IT IS WE'RE TRYING TO BUILD. SO WE CAN PUT TOGETHER ALL OF THOSE BASICS THAT WE FIRST TALKED ABOUT THE BUYING OF LAND AND THE BUILDING OF BUILDINGS, AND THEN FIXING BUILDINGS AND FIXING BUSSES OR BUYING BUSSES. WE CAN PUT THOSE THINGS ALL TOGETHER. BUT IF WE'RE TRYING TO BUILD A STADIUM OVER A THOUSAND SEATS, NATATORIUM, THAT MEANS A SWIMMING FACILITY, GYMS, PLAY AREAS OR PLAYGROUNDS, PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS, OR TECHNOLOGY THAT'S NOT DIRECTLY REQUIRED FOR THE INFRASTRUCTURE OF A PARTICULAR BUILDING. THOSE THINGS HAVE TO BE AS SEPARATE ITEMS. SO WE AS A DISTRICT CAN'T HIDE THE BALL AND SAY, WE NEED $200 MILLION TO BUILD THIS PROJECT AND THEN USE $150 (MILLION) OF THAT FOR A STADIUM. WE HAVE TO TELL THE VOTERS WHAT IT IS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE USING THE MONEY FOR WITHIN THESE CATEGORIES. SO THERE'S SOME VERY COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT BONDS. THE FIRST ONE IS THAT IF A BOND IS APPROVED, MY PROPERTY TAXES WILL GO UP. THAT CAN BE TRUE, BUT IT'S NOT ALWAYS TRUE. MANY DISTRICTS CAN ISSUE BONDS WITHOUT INCREASING THE TAX RATE ON THEIR S&I PORTION OF THE TAX RATE. SO THIS GETS CONFUSING, ESPECIALLY BECAUSE THE 86TH LEGISLATURE REQUIRES THAT WHENEVER WE PUT A PROPOSITION ON THE BALLOT, WE USE THE WORDS THIS IS A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE AND THAT HAS TO BE IN THERE, EVEN IF THE FUNCTIONAL TAX RATE TO OUR HOMEOWNER ACTUALLY STAYS THE SAME OR DECREASES. BECAUSE OF WHAT KIM SAID THE TAX RATE FOR THE HOMEOWNER IS BUILT UP OF TWO PARTS THE M&O AND THE S&I. THE S&I PORTION COULD STAY EXACTLY THE SAME, AND THE S&I PORTION IS THE PART CONNECTED TO THE BOND. AND SO EVEN IF WE ARE NOT CHANGING THAT'S S&I PORTION, WE STILL HAVE TO PUT THIS IS A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE ON THE BALLOT WHEN THE VOTERS GO TO VOTE. SO THERE'S SOME CONFUSION ABOUT THAT. THAT MAY HAVE BEEN SPURRED ON BY THIS REQUIREMENT FROM THE LEGISLATURE. THE OTHER MISCONCEPTION IS THAT BONDS MEAN THAT OLDER AND DISABLED TAXPAYERS ARE HURT BY THIS PROCESS BECAUSE ONCE YOU'RE ON DISABILITY OR ONCE YOU'RE RETIRED, YOU HAVE A FIXED INCOME, AND THAT MEANS IT'S HARDER TO COPE WITH THE FLUCTUATIONS IN THE MARKET. BUT IF YOU'RE AN OVER 65 PERSON OR A DISABLED PERSON AND YOU HAVE AN EXEMPTION ON FILE WITH THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT WHERE YOU LIVE, SCHOOL DISTRICT TAXES DO NOT INCREASE EVEN WITH A BOND. YOUR EXEMPTION REMAINS IN PLACE AND YOUR TAX RATE WOULD NOT INCREASE. THAT'S IN THE TAX CODE 11.13C. ANOTHER VERY COMMON MISCONCEPTION IS THAT SCHOOLS SHOULDN'T BE IN DEBT. THAT JUST MEANS THEY'RE MISMANAGING THEIR FUNDS, VERY MUCH LIKE HAVING A HOME MORTGAGE. A BOND IS CONSIDERED TO BE A HEALTHY DEBT. IT ALLOWS FOR THAT COMPLETION OF LARGE PROJECTS WHILE MAINTAINING OPERATIONS. RIGHT. WE DON'T HAVE TO SACRIFICE HOW WE'RE EDUCATING OUR KIDS DAY TO DAY IN ORDER TO MAKE REPAIRS OR IMPROVE OUR FACILITIES. SO WHAT THIS ALL MEANS IS THAT VOTING MATTERS. SO THE FRISCO ISD BOARD CAN ORDER A BOND ELECTION, BUT WE CAN'T ISSUE BONDS OR SPEND THE BOND MONEY WITHOUT THE VOTERS APPROVING THE PROJECTS THAT WE'VE PUT FORWARD FOR THEM IN THE FORM OF PROPOSITION. VOTERS CAN EDUCATE THEMSELVES ON EACH PROPOSITION, LEARN ABOUT EACH PROJECT AND HOW IT MIGHT IMPACT THEM IN THEIR COMMUNITIES, SPEAK WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS ABOUT WHAT THEY THINK [01:10:01] IS IMPORTANT AND WHY, AND ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO GET INVOLVED. YOU NEED TO GO TO THE BALLOT BOX TO MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD BECAUSE AGAIN, THE BOARD HAS LIMITED ABILITY. WE'RE ALL YOU CAN DO IS APPROVE THAT AN ELECTION HAPPENS, AND THEN IT'S THE VOTERS OF OUR COMMUNITY WHO DECIDE WHAT IT IS THAT ACTUALLY MOVES FORWARD. THANK YOU ALL FOR LISTENING, AND I HOPE THAT HELPS WITH SOME OF THE BASICS. ANY QUESTIONS? I DO HAVE A QUESTION. AND IT'S MAYBE IT'S SOMETHING I SHOULD KNOW ALREADY. I'M, LIKE I SAID, I TEND TO BE FOR THE BOND. THE WHOLE BOND PACKAGE GETTING IT AND HAVING IT APPROVED. BUT I ALWAYS SOMETHING IN THE BACK OF MY MIND. I'M SURE SOMEBODY CAN ANSWER THIS. WHY WOULDN'T WE TRY TO SAVE MONEY UP FRONT, LIKE, RIGHT NOW START SAVING MONEY FOR WHEN WE NEEDED IT TO MAKE THOSE PURCHASES WITHOUT HAVING TO GO INTO DEBT, WITHOUT HAVING TO PAY THE INTEREST RATE. AND LIKE I SAID, THIS IS JUST SOMETHING I JUST LIKE TO KNOW. IT'S NOT IT'S NOT I'M NOT GOING TO BE MAKING A DECISION BASED ON THAT. I'M JUST CURIOUS. AND I'M SURE KIM CAN SPEAK MORE INTELLIGENTLY TO THE ANSWER OF THAT QUESTION BUT ONE THING I CAN SAY IS THAT WE HAVE BEEN. SO I KNOW WE'VE ALREADY BEEN CONTEMPLATING TIRZ MONEY AND HOW WE CAN USE THAT TO HELP OFFSET THE S&I TAX RATE, WHICH, IF WE HADN'T DONE THAT, IF WE HADN'T PLANNED AHEAD AND HAD THE TIRZ MONEY TO HELP US, THEN WE WOULD HAVE TO CONSIDER RAISING THE S&I TAX RATE, WHICH AT THIS TIME WE ARE NOT CONSIDERING RAISING. SO WE HAVE DONE THAT THINKING AHEAD AND PLANNING LONG TERM. IT'S JUST UNFORTUNATELY WE'RE AT A POINT WHERE WE HAVE MAJOR PROJECTS THAT NEED TO HAPPEN, AND WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO TAKE THOSE ON WITHOUT IMPACTING OUR DAY TO DAY OPERATIONS. WE WANT THE QUALITY OF THE EDUCATION WE PROVIDE TO OUR STUDENTS DAY TO DAY, TO REMAIN CONSISTENTLY AT A VERY HIGH LEVEL WITHOUT HAVING TO SACRIFICE OUR OPERATIONS TO PAY FOR THESE MAJOR PROJECTS. THOSE MAJOR PROJECTS, JUST LIKE WHEN YOU HAVE A HOME AND YOU HAVE SOMETHING UNEXPECTED HAPPEN, LIKE YOU HAVE A FLOOD OR A MAJOR LEAK, YOU HOPE YOU HAVE INSURANCE TO COVER IT, BUT THERE'S SOME THINGS THAT GO BEYOND THAT, AND YOU HAVE TO DIP INTO YOUR SAVINGS OR DIP INTO SOME OTHER ACCOUNT TO PAY FOR IT. AND THIS IS WHAT WE DO YEAH. AND I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND. I WASN'T REALLY TALKING ABOUT THAT. I WAS TALKING ABOUT THE THINGS THAT WE KNOW ARE COMING. SO IT MIGHT [INAUDIBLE]. I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. AND EVERYTHING ELSE YOU SAID IS TOTALLY RIGHT. WHAT IF WE WERE TO SAVE MONEY FOR MAJOR PROJECTS THAT WE SEE COMING DOWN THE PIKE, WE WOULD BE SAVING THAT MONEY FROM OUR OPERATING BUDGET FROM THE M&O SIDE. SO YOU CAN'T, YOU CAN ONLY USE I&S TAXES TO PAY FOR DEBT. SO YOU CAN'T USE THAT MONEY TO SAVE UP TO PAY FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS, YOU WOULD HAVE TO, YOU WOULD HAVE TO TAKE MONEY OUT OF YOUR ESSENTIALLY YOUR M&O FUND BALANCE OR SAVE FROM OPERATIONS IN ORDER TO PAY FOR PROJECTS LIKE THAT. NOW WE IN THE PAST, WHEN WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO, WE HAVE SAVED SOME MONEY TO DO SOME OF THOSE THINGS. SO IN YEARS PAST, IF WE HAD YEARS WHERE WE HAD LARGE SURPLUSES AT THE END OF THE YEAR, WE PUT SOME OF THAT MONEY IN WHAT WE CALL A LOCAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND, AND THAT HAS HELPED US OVER TIME WITH SMALLER PROJECTS THAT WE DIDN'T HAVE NECESSARILY PLANNED WITHIN OUR 2018 BOND PROGRAM. WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO ESSENTIALLY SAVE AND USE THAT MONEY FOR THOSE TYPES OF THINGS. BUT FOR THESE LARGE PROJECTS WE JUST DON'T HAVE THE CAPACITY WITHIN OUR OPERATING BUDGET TO SAVE FOR THESE LARGER PROJECTS. AND SO DEBT IS THE WAY THAT WE PAY FOR THOSE. I'M JUST CURIOUS LIKE FOR SOMETHING LIKE THAT IT WOULD RAISING TAXES. IS THAT AN OPTION? LIKE, HEY, OKAY, THAT'S WHAT I KNOW. YOU CAN'T YOU CAN'T RAISE THE TAX RATE. WITH THE IDEA OF SAVING FOR SOMETHING AND NOT TAKING OUT DEBT, THAT IT CAN ONLY BE PAID, THAT THOSE TAXES CAN ONLY BE USED TO PAY DEBT. I KNEW THERE WAS A REASON. I JUST DIDN'T KNOW WHAT THE REASON WAS. THANK YOU. YEAH. TODD'S QUESTION WAS, CAN YOU RAISE THE TAXES TO PAY DEBT OFF FASTER? AND SO, YES. YEAH. ISSUING. SO IN OTHER WORDS, INSTEAD OF ISSUING 30 YEAR BONDS, WE ONLY WANT TO ISSUE 15 YEAR BONDS. THAT WOULD ESSENTIALLY YOU WOULD HAVE TO RAISE THE TAX RATE IN ORDER TO DO THAT. OR IF THE BOARD SAID, YOU KNOW, WE WANT TO PAY OFF THIS MUCH PRINCIPAL PER YEAR SO THAT WE PAY OFF DEBT FASTER IN, YOU KNOW, OVER AND ABOVE OUR REQUIRED DEBT PAYMENT. THEN YOU COULD RAISE THE TAX RATE TO DO THAT AS WELL. THAT'S BUT YEAH. AND I'LL JUST ADD ON TO THAT WHAT I MENTIONED ABOUT MONITORING AFTER THE THE PROPOSITIONS HAVE BEEN APPROVED. [01:15:05] THAT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN ALSO CONSIDER AT THE MONITOR STAGE. SO IF FOR EXAMPLE YOU WERE ABLE TO COMPLETE A PROJECT BELOW BUDGET, YOU COULD LOOK AT WHERE THOSE FUNDS ARE. AND IF YOU'D LIKE TO PAY OFF THE DEBT EARLIER THAN YOU HAD ORIGINALLY ANTICIPATED. THAT'S AN APPROVED USE OF THE MONITORING AND RESTRUCTURE OF [INAUDIBLE] THE MONEY THAT'S BEEN APPROVED BY THE VOTERS. I JUST HAD A QUICK QUESTION ON TIMELINE. CAN WE GO BACK TO THAT SLIDE THAT HAD THE YELLOW AND THE ORANGISH BOXES THE FIRST ONE? YOU GOT IT. I'LL GET THERE. OKAY. THANK YOU. THIS ONE OR THE PREVIOUS ONE? YEAH THAT ONE. OKAY. SO THAT ONE RIGHT THERE THAT SAYS THAT BULLET THAT SAYS DETERMINE PRIORITIES AND TYPES OF PROJECTS. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND. SO THIS BOARD WAS PRESENTED WITH SOME RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE BOND COMMITTEE. I THINK SEVERAL TRUSTEES, IF NOT ALL OF US, GAVE SOME FEEDBACK REGARDING COULD WE SEPARATE OUT BOND A SOME OF THE ITEMS IN BOND A THINGS LIKE THAT? IS THAT IS THAT WHEN WE WERE DETERMINING THE PRIORITIES AND TYPES OF PROJECTS, IS THAT THE MECHANISM FOR DOING THAT? YES, YES. SO YOUR YOUR PRIORITIES AND TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT YOU'RE GOING TO INCLUDE WOULD DRIVE THE PROPOSITIONS THAT GO ON THE BALLOT. SO THERE ARE SOME LIKE ESTHER WAS SAYING AND WE TALKED ABOUT LAST WEEK, THERE ARE SOME SPECIFIC THINGS THAT IF SEPARATED OR THAT IF THEY'RE PROPOSED, HAVE TO GO ON SEPARATE PROPOSITIONS. TYPICALLY EVERYTHING ELSE WOULD GO INTO A GENERAL BOND PROPOSITION. IF THE BOARD'S PRIORITY IS TO SEPARATE THOSE EVEN FURTHER, THEN ESSENTIALLY THAT'S WHERE YOU WOULD DRAFT THOSE PROPOSED PROPOSITIONS. WHAT THAT DOES KIND OF ON THE ON THE FLIP SIDE, WHEN YOU GO OVER HERE IN TERMS OF DETERMINING SCOPE AND THINGS LIKE THAT, THE THE PROPOSITION THAT YOU HAVE ON THE BALLOT THAT THEN GOES TO VOTERS AND POTENTIALLY GETS APPROVED DETERMINES YOUR AUTHORITY BEYOND THE BOND ELECTION. SO IF YOU HAVE A SPECIFIC PROJECT ON A SPECIFIC PROPOSITION AND THEN THE VOTERS APPROVE THAT, BUT THE BOARD DECIDES SOMETHING ELSE HAS A GREATER NEED. YOU CAN'T AT THAT POINT REPURPOSE THAT BOND. IN WITHIN A GENERAL PROPOSITION, WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT FACILITY MAINTENANCE AND THE TYPES OF THINGS THAT GO INTO A GENERAL PROPOSITION, YOU CAN REPURPOSE, BUT ONLY FOR GENERAL PROPOSITION TYPE THINGS. I UNDERSTAND POST THE BOND, WHAT I'M WHAT I'M JUST WANTING TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND IS SO A FEW OF US GAVE SOME FEEDBACK DURING OUR LAST MEETING WHEN WE DISCUSSED THIS, WHEN THIS WAS PRESENTED BY THE BOND COMMITTEE. RIGHT. AND THEN YOU'RE HAVING INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS WITH US ONE ON ONE. SO WHAT I'M ASKING IS, IS THAT FEEDBACK GOING TO BE TAKEN AND THEREFORE WHAT WE ARE ASKED TO LOOK AT ON THE 19TH WILL REFLECT THAT. AND IS THAT WHAT THIS BULLET IS INTENDED TO DO? BECAUSE WE'RE NOT WE'RE NOT TAKING ACTION AS A BOARD TO DO THIS, RIGHT? YES. THAT'S CORRECT. SO THAT'S SORRY, THAT MAY BE UNCLEAR ON MY END IN TERMS OF ME SEPARATING THINGS OUT. ONCE WE HAVE THE ASSESSED NEEDS AND HAVE RECEIVED COMMUNITY IMPACT THROUGH OUR COMMITTEE THAT WE'VE PUT TOGETHER, THAT INFORMATION IS OBVIOUSLY PRESENTED TO YOU GUYS AS A BOARD. AND THEN WE MEET WITH YOU TO GET YOUR FEEDBACK ON THOSE. THAT HELPS US DRAFT THE PROPOSITIONS IN A WAY THAT INCLUDES YOUR FEEDBACK AND WHAT YOU'VE INDICATED AS YOUR PRIORITIES ON THE VARIOUS TYPES OF PROJECTS. THAT'S WHAT I WAS ASKING. THANK YOU. AND I REALIZE THAT THERE ARE SEVEN TRUSTEES, AND SO THAT WORK IS GOING TO BE SORT OF DOING THE BEST YOU CAN, RIGHT, WITH POTENTIALLY SEVEN DIFFERENT PEOPLE'S FEEDBACK. THAT'S WHAT I WANTED TO KNOW IF THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS THERE. THANK YOU. YES. I'LL JUST MAKE A QUICK COMMENT TO THAT PIECE BECAUSE I THINK MRS. ELAD'S RIGHT. WE HAVE AN IMPORTANT FUNCTION HERE, KIND OF BEFORE A VOTE. I DO WANT TO MAKE A COMMENT THOUGH TO THIS ACTUALLY THE SAME EXACT SLIDE. AND I APPRECIATE YOU PUTTING THE TIMELINE LIKE THIS, BECAUSE I FOUND THE DAC PRESENTATION TO BE VERY WELCOMED. RIGHT. THE FACT THAT AND I THINK THE PUBLIC SHOULD KNOW THAT AS A DISTRICT, WE HAVE A COMMITTEE THAT THEN HAS A SPECIFIC BOND EXPLORATION SUBCOMMITTEE DEVELOPED THAT MEETS THROUGHOUT LAST YEAR. AND THEN ALSO IT'S COLLABORATIVE NATURE, WHICH I DON'T KNOW HOW OFTEN THIS IS DONE, BUT I THOUGHT IT WAS VERY WELL DONE IN OUR CASE, WHERE YOU HAVE A COMBINATION OF STAKEHOLDERS, PARENTS, NON-PARENTS DISTRICT STAFF AS WELL AS FISD STUDENTS GETTING TOGETHER THROUGHOUT THIS YEAR TO DEVELOP THIS PACKAGE. WHICH FOR THOSE THAT ARE LISTENING OR WATCHING ACTUALLY RESULTED IN NOT JUST A PACKAGE, BUT ALSO SEVERAL ITEMS DROPPING OFF THAT PACKAGE THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THAT OF THOSE MEETINGS. [01:20:02] AND SO THERE IS SOME LEVEL OF NOT JUST, DISTRICT WIDE COLLABORATION ON A LOT OF LEVELS, BUT SOME LEVEL OF PRIOR DILIGENCE TO CUT BACK ON THAT IN SOME TYPE OF PRUDENT WAY. I FOUND THAT TO BE VERY INFORMATIVE AND VERY HELPFUL FOR ME, AND WHAT I WOULD JUST DESCRIBE AS VERY HEALTHY PROCESS. AND SO NOW IT'S TO US AND WE CAN KIND OF HOPEFULLY PUT SOME FINISHING TOUCHES ON THAT SO I DO APPRECIATE YOU KIND OF ILLUSTRATING THIS TIMELINE A LITTLE BIT FOR US. SO WHAT WE THOUGHT WE WOULD DO, AND IF YOU HAVE OTHER QUESTIONS FOR ESTHER, I WON'T INTERRUPT THOSE. BUT WHAT WE THOUGHT WE WOULD DO IS JUST PUT BACK UP ON THE SCREEN THE THREE PROPOSITIONS THAT YOU GUYS SAW AT LAST WEEK'S WORKSHOP AND JUST OPEN IT UP FOR ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION. WE DO WANT TO MAKE SURE BEFORE WE LEAVE TODAY TO GET MEETINGS SCHEDULED EITHER INDIVIDUALLY OR IN SMALL GROUPS OF 2 OR 3 JUST OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS SO WE CAN ANSWER, YOU KNOW, IN IN DEPTH, MORE DETAILED QUESTIONS. BUT JUST IN GENERAL WE JUST WANTED TO OPEN IT UP FOR QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION FROM THE BOARD ON THE RECOMMENDED BOND PACKAGE. WE'RE THERE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? I DON'T HAVE A QUESTION, BUT JUST TO REITERATE THE COMMENT THAT I MADE IN OUR PREVIOUS MEETING, JUST IN CASE SOME COMMUNITY MEMBERS ARE WATCHING THIS ONE AND DIDN'T WATCH THAT ONE. BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE US BREAK UP THAT PROPOSITION A INTO A FEW DIFFERENT PIECES. I DON'T KNOW THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE EIGHT DIFFERENT BONDS, BUT I JUST THINK THAT'S ALMOST $1 BILLION AND WHICH THE MAJORITY OF THAT IS THE 25 YEAR CAMPUS REFRESH. SO MY PERSONAL OPINION WOULD BE TO AT LEAST BREAK THAT ONE OUT AND THEN PERHAPS BREAK OUT A COUPLE OF THE OTHERS THAT MAYBE SORT OF GO IN LINE. LIKE I LOOK AT STALEY AND SOME OTHER MAINTENANCE LANDSCAPING THINGS TO ME COULD KIND OF BE BUCKETED TOGETHER. AGAIN, THAT IS MY PERSONAL OPINION AND REQUEST. WHICH I'M SORRY, WHICH PIECE WAS THAT, MISS ELAD? WHICH IS WHICH PIECE IS THE 27 YOU WENT THROUGH? [INAUDIBLE] THE PROP A. YEAH, I KNOW THAT. BUT WHICH WITHIN PROP A YOU SAID $27 MILLION BREAK OUT. OH NO I SAID THE 25 YEAR CAMPUS REFRESH BECAUSE THAT REPRESENTS, I THINK, OVER HALF A MILLION. HALF, HALF A BILLION. EXCUSE ME. OF THAT $986 MILLION. SO TO ME THAT'S A PRETTY BIG CHUNK. SO I WANT TO RESPOND TO TO THAT. RESPECTFULLY I WAS ON THE RECEIVING END OF [INAUDIBLE] MANY OF THE PROJECTS AFTER THAT 2018 BOND ELECTION DID PASS, AND THE MANEUVERING AND HAVING TO COME BACK TO US WHEN MAJOR PROJECTS SURFACED AND WE NEEDED TO BE ABLE TO PULL FROM DIFFERENT PIECES OF THAT BOND. I DO NOT THINK SEPARATING THAT PROPOSITION WOULD BENEFIT US, SHOULD WE, BECAUSE WE'RE COMING UP ON THE 25 YEAR CAMPUS REFRESH. BUT THESE ARE 25 YEAR PROJECTS, AND SOME OF THESE CAMPUSES MAY FALL BELOW THE AMOUNT THAT THAT WILL THAT IS SCHEDULED TO BE ALLOTTED. AND THERE MAY BE THINGS ON OTHER CAMPUSES THAT REQUIRE A LOT MORE ATTENTION. I REMEMBER TWO YEARS AGO THERE WAS A PROJECT THAT WE WENT IN ON, AND THEY DIDN'T ANTICIPATE IT WAS GOING LIKE WHEN THEY OPENED IT UP, THERE WERE MORE CHALLENGES, AND IF WE'RE SEPARATING THAT PROPOSAL WILL BE VERY LIMITED TO HOW WE CAN MANEUVER AND GET SOME OF THOSE THINGS DONE. AND SO, RESPECTFULLY, I AM IN AGREEMENT WITH THE WAY THE PROPOSITIONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO US IN TAKING ACCOUNT THAT THERE WERE ACTUAL COMMUNITY MEMBERS, PARENTS, TAXPAYERS THAT MAY NOT NECESSARILY HAVE CHILDREN IN THE DISTRICT, BUT THEY'RE STILL TAXPAYERS, TEACHERS AND STUDENTS. THEY THEY PUT THIS TOGETHER AND I'M GOING TO PROBABLY NEED TO STICK WITH THEM ON THIS ONE. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND. SO THE 25 YEAR CAMPUS REFRESH, IF THAT WAS TO BE SEPARATED OUT, ANYTHING WITHIN THAT 25 YEAR CAMPUS REFRESH COULD BE MOVED AROUND. CORRECT. LIKE IF WE IF ASHLEY ENDED UP COSTING MORE THAN. WELL STALEY'S NOT A GOOD EXAMPLE. CENTENNIAL. THOSE MONIES COULD BE MOVED AROUND WITHOUT BOARD APPROVAL BECAUSE IT ALL FELL WITHIN THAT BOND. YES. WITHIN THE SCHOOLS, WITHIN THE 25 YEAR CAMPUS REFRESH TYPE OF PROJECT? [01:25:01] YES. NOW, IF YOU HAD ANOTHER SCHOOL THAT'S NOT GETTING A 25 YEAR REFRESH THAT NEEDED SOME, THAT HAD SOME BIG SYSTEM BREAK, YOU COULDN'T TAKE MONEY FROM THE REFRESH AND REPURPOSE IT OVER TO ONE OF THOSE OTHER NEEDS, RIGHT? WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO DO THAT IF IT WAS PASSED AS PROPOSED HERE? YOU WOULD. OKAY, SO THAT'S MY THAT'S MY CONCERN. I'M NOT SAYING FOR CLARIFICATION THAT WE WOULD BE DOING THAT OUTSIDE OF THE SCHOOLS THAT ARE ON THIS. I'M SAYING, WHAT IF THEY GO INTO A SCHOOL THINKING THE ONLY THING THEY NEED TO DO IS A REFRESH AND THEY OPEN UP SOMETHING AND IT AND IT REQUIRES MORE THAN WHAT THEY ORIGINALLY ALLOTTED. YEAH. I UNDERSTAND YEAH, I UNDERSTAND, I JUST THINK FROM A COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVE, THAT'S A HUGE AMOUNT. IT IS. AND I FIND GREAT COMFORT WITH THE FACT THAT COMMUNITY MEMBERS GAVE US THAT SUGGESTION. THAT WAS THEIR RECOMMENDATION. SO IF IT WERE JUST SOMETHING THAT AN OUTSIDE SOURCE CAME IN AND GAVE US, I WOULD PROBABLY NEED TO THINK MORE ABOUT IT. BUT THE FACT THAT THESE INDIVIDUALS AND THEY DIDN'T, YOU KNOW, MARK MENTIONED THAT THEY MET LAST YEAR. THEY NEVER STOPPED MEETING. THIS GROUP MEETS COLLECTIVELY EVERY YEAR ON THE SAME. THEY HAVE THE SAME CADENCE. SOME NEW MEMBERS JOIN AFTER THEY'VE COMPLETED THEIR APPLICATIONS AND THEY'RE, YOU KNOW, ACCEPTED INTO THE DAC. BUT THIS LIKE THEY DIDN'T JUST DECIDE ON THIS BOND PACKAGE THROUGHOUT THIS YEAR AND BEING ON THE RECEIVING END AFTER A BOND ELECTION WHEN THAT 18 BOND PASSED, THERE WERE SO MANY THINGS THAT NEEDED TO BE DONE, AND IT SEEMED LIKE FOR ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF, WE WERE COMING BACK TO BOARD MEETINGS, MAKING DECISIONS TO MOVE FUNDS AROUND GOPAL CAN PROBABLY SPEAK TO THAT, BUT I WOULD JUST BE VERY LEERY OF SEPARATING PROPOSITIONS WHEN WE DON'T UNDERSTAND THE FUNCTIONALITY BEHIND THEM. SO I UNDERSTAND AND I HEAR BOTH OF YOU WHAT YOU SAID, BUT MY RECOMMENDATION, YOU KNOW, MY GUT FEELING, BASED ON WHAT I THINK, IS THAT THE 25 YEAR CAMPUS REFRESH, I DO UNDERSTAND IT HAS TO BE INTACT, BUT FROM THE $986 MILLION, IF WE CAN SEPARATE THAT INTO SEPARATE LINE ITEMS WITH RESPECT TO 25 YEAR CAMPUS BEING ONE, AND THEN MAYBE, YOU KNOW, BUNDLING THE REST IN THE OTHER OR, YOU KNOW, OR MAYBE TWO MORE, YOU KNOW, IS SOMETHING IF IT CAN BE LOOKED INTO IS WHAT MY SUGGESTION IS. CAN I ADD A COMMENT? IS THAT OKAY? YES, SURE. JUST JUST SO YOU KNOW, AS YOU TALK THROUGH THIS AND ULTIMATELY, IT'S GOING TO BE YOUR DECISION. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THIS GENERAL PROP EIGHT GIVES US IS A LOT OF FLEXIBILITY. WHEN WE LOOK AT 77 CAMPUSES, OVER 100 BUILDINGS IN OUR DISTRICT THAT ARE AGING. THERE WAS A LOT OF THOUGHT PUT INTO THIS PROPOSITION IN TERMS OF A COLLECTIVE, HOLISTIC PACKAGE WHERE WE'RE REALLY LOOKING TO SET UP THE FUTURE OF A 25-30 YEAR OLD BUILDING. IF YOU SEPARATE PROPOSITIONS OUT IN ONE PASSES AND TWO FAIL, YOU HAVE JUST DISRUPTED OUR ENTIRE MAINTENANCE CYCLE AND REALLY, ALL YOU'RE DOING IS YOU'RE SAYING, I'M GOING TO DEFER THAT MAINTENANCE TO ANOTHER DATE DOWN THE ROAD, WHICH IS GOING TO BE MORE EXPENSIVE. I JUST I WANT TO MAKE CLEAR THAT EVERYBODY KNOWS BY DOING THAT WE RUN THE RISK OF SOME PASSING AND SOME NOT. FOR INSTANCE, IF THE 25 YEAR CAMPUS REFRESH FAILS, WE HAVE ABOUT 100 AND I THINK $10 MILLION IN GENERAL FACILITY MAINTENANCE. THAT WOULD HAVE TO COVER 25 YEAR OLD BUILDINGS, 20 OF THEM THAT MAY HAVE HVAC SYSTEMS THAT QUIT WORKING. WE WOULD NOT HAVE THE FUNDS THEN TO DO THAT BASED ON BREAKING THEM OUT AND SOME OF THEM PASSING, SOME OF THEM FAILING. I UNDERSTAND WHY YOU'RE ASKING TO BREAK THEM OUT. BUT I JUST I JUST CAUTION THAT DOING SO COULD REALLY DISRUPT OUR ENTIRE MAINTENANCE CYCLE AS WE MOVE FORWARD FOR THESE BUILDINGS, NOT ONLY FOR THIS BOND CYCLE, BUT AGAIN, REMEMBER WHEN WE SHOWED YOU THE SLIDE. AFTER 2030, WE HAVE ANOTHER 17 SCHOOLS THAT ARE GOING TO BE HITTING 25 YEARS OLD AS WELL. SO ANYTHING THAT WE DEFER TO 30 YEARS IS ONLY GOING TO THEN IN 2030 PUSH US AT LIKE 27, 35 CAMPUSES THAT ARE HITTING THE 25 TO 32 YEAR MARK. SO I JUST WANTED TO BE CLEAR ON THAT. YEAH, I COULD SEE BOTH SIDES OF THIS. ONE TO BREAK IT OUT. AND I TEND TO BE ON THE SIDE OF WANTING WANTING TO BREAK IT OUT. MR. WARSAW, I MAYBE I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND, BUT SAY WE BROKE OUT THE 25 YEAR CAMPUS REFRESH. [01:30:02] HOW DOES THAT HURT US? OR WHAT DOES THAT AND LIKE I SAID, I DON'T REALLY HAVE I'M TRYING TO LEARN, SO I'LL FIGURE OUT WHICH WAY TO GO ON IT. BUT I COME FROM THE PERSPECTIVE THAT BREAKING IT DOWN A LITTLE BIT MORE, WHEREAS IT MIGHT BE HARDER TO GET DONE BECAUSE OF VOTER FATIGUE AND THEM GOING TO THE [INAUDIBLE]. BUT I SEE US TAKING WHAT SOME OF OUR RESPONSIBILITY AS A BOARD AND KIND OF PUTTING IT OUT THERE. SO JUST JUST HELP ME OUT ON THAT PIECE JUST. AND I MAY BE OVERSIMPLIFYING THIS, BUT TO ME, IF YOU BREAK IT OUT IN ANY OF THEM INDIVIDUALLY WERE TO FAIL WHILE OTHERS PASS. YOU HAVE JUST DISRUPTED OUR ENTIRE CYCLE THAT WE PUT TOGETHER FOR CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE. LET ME SAY, IF THEY ALL PASS THEN IT HURTS US IN NO WAY. LET ME LET ME SAY THIS LIKE WE HAVE THE 25 YEAR CANVAS REFRESH, AND THEN WE HAVE THE TURF FOR BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL'S. OKAY, WHAT IF SOMEBODY SHOULD THE VOTER HAVE THE OPTION TO SAY, HEY, YOU KNOW SOMETHING? I KNOW I'M FOR IT, SO I'M NOT. I'M JUST SAYING. BUT SHOULDN'T THE VOTER HAVE THE OPTION TO SAY, HEY, YOU KNOW, TURF AND SOFTBALL, I MIGHT NOT WANT TO DO THAT. AND THAT WOULD NOT HURT OUR 25 YEAR CANVAS REFRESH. OR ARE YOU SAYING IT WOULD? THAT EXAMPLE WOULD NOT. YEAH. WELL, THAT I THINK THAT'S MORE OR LESS WHAT THEY'RE THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT BREAKING IT UP INTO PIECES LIKE THAT, THAT JUST PIECES THAT MAKE SENSE, THAT GO TOGETHER. AND I DON'T THINK WE HAVE TO GET TOO DETAILED ABOUT DOING THAT. BUT FOR ME AND I WOULD BE FOR EITHER WAY. BUT FOR ME, BREAKING OUT THE 25 YEAR CAMPUS REFRESH IS LIKE, TO ME, IT WOULD SEEM LIKE A NO BRAINER. THAT'S ALL. IF I COULD JUST ADD ONE THING, I THINK I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S NOT ANY KIND OF MISUNDERSTANDING, THAT A 25 YEAR REFRESH IS JUST A REMODEL. SO IT'S IT'S NOT JUST A REMODEL. THERE'S AN ENTIRE FACILITY MASTER PLAN TO KEEP ALL OF OUR BUILDINGS UP TO DATE. THERE'S SOME OF THAT THAT TAKES PLACE IN, YOU KNOW, EVERY 7, 15 YEARS. AND SO FOR THE SCHOOLS THAT AREN'T 25 YEARS OLD, ALL OF THOSE REGULAR MAINTENANCE CYCLES THAT HAPPEN AT 7 AND 15 YEARS AND IN BETWEEN ARE PART OF THE GENERAL FACILITY MAINTENANCE PROJECT. ALL OF THOSE CYCLES THAT HAPPEN AT 25 YEARS OR GREATER. SO REPLACING HVAC SYSTEMS, THOSE TYPES OF THINGS HAPPEN IN THAT 25 YEAR CAMPUS REFRESH. SO WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT JUST AT 25 YEARS GOING IN AND COSMETICALLY UPDATING A BUILDING, AND THAT'S WHAT THAT PROJECT IS. SO AT A MINIMUM, IN ORDER TO NOT DISRUPT THE FACILITY MASTER PLAN LIKE SCOTT WAS TALKING ABOUT YOU, YOU NEED YOUR 25 YEAR REFRESH, YOUR GENERAL FACILITY MAINTENANCE, YOUR PAVING AND LANDSCAPE REPAIRS AND YOUR FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT ALL TO BE TOGETHER BECAUSE THAT'S ALL PART OF AND PROBABLY. OH, SORRY. SAFETY AND SECURITY TOO. THAT'S ALL PART OF THE THE OVERALL FACILITY MASTER PLAN. SO THE TURF PIECE, THE TRANSPORTATION PIECE, THOSE WOULDN'T DISRUPT THE FACILITY MASTER PLAN, BUT SEPARATING OUT ANY OF THOSE OTHERS REALLY WOULD. SO I TOTALLY GET IT. SO BUT I SAID, BUT TO THE POINT THAT MY COLLEAGUES WERE MAKING. WOULD THAT MAKE SENSE JUST TO TAKE OUT THE TRANSPORTATION AND TURF? AND HERE'S I KNOW THE PROBLEM THAT WE'LL BE DEALING WITH IS YOU MIGHT HAVE SOME VOTERS THAT JUST LOOK AT IT AND SAY, HEY, WE DON'T WANT THIS WHERE IF WE PACKED IT IN TOGETHER, WE'D GET IT. AND, YOU KNOW, AND IT'S SOMETHING, LIKE I SAID, I'M FOR, BUT WE'RE TAKING THE CHOICE OUT OF THE VOTERS HANDS AND THAT'S IT. THAT'S JUST IT'S NOT A BIG ISSUE. SO FOR THE FOR THE PIECES OF THESE PROJECTS THAT AREN'T PART OF THE FACILITY MASTER PLAN IF THE BOARD DECIDES TO SEPARATE THOSE OUT AS SEPARATE PROPOSITIONS, THAT IS WITHIN YOUR PURVIEW TO DO. IT SOUNDED LIKE JUST FROM ME LISTENING, AND MAYBE I WAS MISINTERPRETING, BUT IT SOUNDED LIKE THE THOUGHT OF SEPARATING OUT THE 25 YEAR PIECE IS JUST BECAUSE OF THE DOLLAR VALUE OF IT. AND SO IF THAT'S THE RATIONALE, THEN I WOULD SUGGEST THAT YOU'RE NOT REALLY YOU NEED TO KEEP ALL OF THOSE PIECES RELATED TO THE FACILITY MASTER PLAN TOGETHER. AND THAT'S THE POINT I WOULD AGREE WITH. I DON'T I'M VERY HESITANT TO PLAY GAMES WITH SEPARATING OUT PROPOSITIONS THAT ARE ON OUR THAT ARE ON THAT ARE IN FRONT OF US, THAT HAVE BEEN DELIBERATED FOR, THAT HAVE BEEN PACKAGED TOGETHER IN A CERTAIN WAY FOR A YEAR BY OUR COMMUNITY. UNLESS THERE IS SOME COMPELLING SUBSTANTIVE REASON THAT, HEY, THIS DOES NOT FIT IN A IF THAT'S THE CASE, I'M ALL EARS. BUT I DON'T LIKE I DON'T LIKE TO ME, THERE'S ALREADY AN INCREDIBLE AMOUNT OF BREAKDOWN WITHIN A THAT WE'RE ALL BEING INFORMED ON. [01:35:10] SO IF THERE WAS A SUBSTANTIVE OR COMPELLING ISSUE WITH, HEY, I DO NOT WANT TURF FOR BASEBALL OR SOFTBALL FIELDS, AND THE COMMUNITY SHOULD KNOW THAT. OKAY, I GET IT. I'M NOT HEARING THAT. AT LEAST IT DIDN'T SOUND LIKE THAT. SO I DON'T KNOW. I'M CERTAINLY FOR GIVING THE COMMUNITY OPTIONS TO VOTE IN SUPPORT. WE'VE GOT ALREADY THREE PROPOSITIONS HERE. AND SO I DON'T KNOW, I DO APPRECIATE THE FEEDBACK FROM ALL THE BOARD MEMBERS ON IT. IT IS HELPING ME, I JUST DON'T I STRUGGLE THAT UNLESS THERE IS SOME COMPELLING, SUBSTANTIVE REASON THAT I DISAGREE WITH THE DAC, OR I DISAGREE WITH THEIR CONCLUSIONS AS TO WHAT BELONGS IN A YOU KNOW, I WOULD LIKE THAT. THAT'S WHAT I KIND OF WANTED TO HEAR IF THERE WAS ANY OF THAT. SO THAT'S JUST MY VIEW. KIMBERLY, I HAVE A QUESTION THAT IT WAS BROUGHT UP PROBABLY RIGHT AFTER THE 2018. SO THIS WAS TWO YEARS BEFORE I GOT ON THE BOARD. SO GOPAL MAY EVEN HAVE SOME MORE INFORMATION. BUT WITH THE TURF FOR THE BASEBALL AND THE SOFTBALL FIELDS, I KNOW THAT THERE WAS A SPECIFIC AMOUNT THAT WAS SCHEDULED FOR THAT 2018. RIGHT. AND THEN THE COMMUNICATION TO OUR COMMUNITY SAID THAT WE WERE GOING TO FINISH OR GIVE. WAS THERE ANOTHER PERCENTAGE OR, YOU KNOW, THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE COMPLETED AFTER AFTER THAT, LIKE AFTER THIS NEXT BOND, IF THIS SHOULD BE APPROVED. SO YOU'RE CORRECT IN THAT THE COMMITTEE DELIBERATED AND ACTUALLY REDUCE THE NUMBER OF WHAT WAS IN THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL BACK IN THE 18 PROGRAM TO OUR TO OUR COMMITTEE, THEY REDUCED IT TO THE THREE PLUS THE TWO NEW BUILDS TO GIVE US FIVE, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WHEN WE GO OUT FOR THE NEXT BOND, WE WOULD LOOK AT PUTTING ADDITIONAL BASEBALL SOFTBALL FIELDS IN THIS PROGRAM. TO MY RECOLLECTION, THEY DIDN'T SAY 100% 50% OF THE REMAINING. IT WAS THAT WE WOULD JUST COME BACK AND REVISIT PUTTING ADDITIONAL FIELDS IN THIS PROGRAM. OKAY. I JUST I WANTED CLARIFICATION ON THAT BECAUSE I HEARD A FEW DIFFERENT THINGS. I DIDN'T KNOW IF THE RECOMMENDATION WAS ALL REMAINING OR, YOU KNOW, AND I'M AND I'M CERTAINLY NOT SUGGESTING, YOU KNOW, THAT WE REDUCE. I'M JUST WANTING TO KNOW WHAT PROMISE WAS MADE IN 2018. HEY DYNETTE, I THINK I CAN ADD A LITTLE BIT TO IT AS WELL. Y'ALL REMEMBER OR Y'ALL DON'T REMEMBER, BUT IN 2018, THE WHOLE GOAL WAS JUST TO GET SOME TURF IN THE DISTRICT IN SOME CAPACITY, BECAUSE WHAT WE WERE DOING DURING THAT TIME, ALL OF IT WAS DIRT. A LOT OF OUR SURROUNDING DISTRICTS WERE GOING TO TURF BEFORE US, AND WE WERE HAVING TO SCHEDULE A LOT OF OUR GAMES ON THOSE TURF FIELDS. SO WHEN WE HAD A POTENTIAL, LET'S JUST SAY, SOFTBALL MATCH UP IN THE PLAYOFFS BETWEEN TWO SOFTBALL TEAMS, WE WERE PLAYING THOSE OVER IN MCKINNEY OR UP IN SALINA, AND IT WAS TWO FRISCO ISD TEAMS. SO THE GOAL IN 2018 TO TRY TO STAY WITHIN THE NUMBERS THAT WE WANTED TO WITH THE BOND PROGRAM WAS TO GET SOME TYPE OF TURF IN FRISCO. SO THAT'S WHY WE DID THREE STADIUMS, ONE ON THE WEST, ONE CENTRALLY AND THEN ONE ON THE EAST. AND THAT HAS REALLY HELPED WITH THOSE RESCHEDULING PIECES WITH PLAYOFF GAMES. AND THEN OF COURSE WE'VE ADDED EMERSON AND PANTHER CREEK SINCE THEN. SO WE HAVE A TOTAL OF FIVE TURF FIELDS ACROSS THE DISTRICT. BUT AS SCOTT SAID THERE IN 2018, WE SAID, LET'S START WITH THREE TO SEE IF WE CAN JUST MEET THE NEEDS OF HAVING SOME TURF TO MEET OUR INITIAL PROBLEMS. AND THEN IN FUTURE BOND PROGRAMS, WE'LL DO EVERYTHING WE CAN TO GET THE REST OF THEM TURFED SO OUR KIDS AREN'T AT A DISADVANTAGE AT OUR OTHER SCHOOLS. SO THAT WAS THE CONVERSATION WITHIN THE BOND COMMITTEE IN 2018. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY. DID ANYONE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? KIMBERLEY? I DON'T I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING ELSE FOR YOU GUYS TODAY. IF THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, THEN WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO ASK IS, AFTER YOU GUYS ADJOURN, IF WE COULD JUST GET THOSE INDIVIDUAL OR SMALL GROUP MEETINGS ON THE CALENDAR SO THAT WE KNOW SO THAT WE HAVE A PLAN FOR THOSE MEETINGS BECAUSE THE NEXT TIME YOU GUYS WILL MEET AS A BOARD TO WOULD BE ON AUGUST 19TH TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSITIONS AND TO CONSIDER CALLING THE ELECTION SO, BUT STILL HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS. AND WOULD THAT INCLUDE THE BONDS AND THE [INAUDIBLE]. YES, YES. ALSO TO JUST TO BE PERFECTLY CLEAR, THERE WILL BE FOUR IF IF WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THE PROPOSITIONS AS THEY ARE ON THE SCREEN RIGHT NOW FOR THE BOND, THERE WILL BE [01:40:03] FOUR TOTAL FISD PROPOSITIONS ON THE NOVEMBER BALLOT. IT WOULD BE THESE THREE BOND ONES AND THEN THE VATRE. BEYOND THAT, YOU KNOW, IF IF WE END UP SPLITTING OUT ADDITIONAL PROPOSITIONS, THEN YOU'LL HAVE MORE. BUT AS OF RIGHT NOW THERE'S FOUR, THE THREE BONDS AND THEN THE VATRE. THANK YOU. AND DURING OUR LAST MEETING OR LAST WORKSHOP THE BOARD COLLECTIVELY TALKED ABOUT A LOT OF WE HAD A LOT OF QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW THE MONEY WAS GOING TO BE ALLOCATED AND WHAT WE WERE GOING TO BE DOING. SO BOARD THE THE BEAUTY OF BEING ON THE THE END RESULT OF A BOND AFTER IT HAS BEEN APPROVED, SHOULD THE COMMUNITY DECIDE TO VOTE FOR IT, IS THAT WE'LL THEN GET TO COME BACK THROUGH OUR SUBCOMMITTEES AND WE WILL STILL HAVE WE'LL BE ABLE TO MAKE AN IMPACT ON SOME OF THE DECISIONS THAT ARE BEING MADE AS IT RELATES TO THE BULLET POINTS. SO IT'S NOT A WE WE GET TO DECIDE IF WE'RE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE BOND ELECTION, AND THEN THAT'S IT. SHOULD THE BOND PASS, THAT'S WHEN THE THE REAL WORK REALLY BEGINS. AND SO I KNOW GOPAL AND I WERE ON THE RECEIVING END OF A LOT OF THAT, BECAUSE WE WERE COMING RIGHT OFF OF THAT BOND ELECTION. AND SO I DO LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU ALL SHOULD THIS BOND PASS ON HOW WE CAN DO WHAT'S BEST FOR KIDS WITH THE THE AMOUNTS GIVEN. BOARD, IF THERE ARE NO ADDITIONS? CAN I SAY ONE LAST THING TO THAT POINT? I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE BOARD KNOWS TOO, THAT IF YOU ARE ASKED IN THE FUTURE TO CONSIDER REPURPOSING BONDS, WE HAVE MADE A PRACTICE OF ALWAYS TAKING THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS TO OUR BOND COMMITTEE FIRST, TO MAKE SURE THAT AS A COMMUNITY, THEY WOULD BE ON BOARD WITH WHATEVER THAT RECOMMENDED CHANGE IS. SO THAT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT'S REQUIRED, BUT IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'VE HISTORICALLY DONE AND WOULD CONTINUE TO DO IN THE FUTURE. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE, SINCE YOU GUYS ALL HAVEN'T BEEN A PART OF THAT BEFORE, THAT, YOU KNOW THAT. THANK YOU. I THINK WE'VE BEEN WORKING TOGETHER LONG ENOUGH TO KNOW THAT I KNOW A LOT OF OUR TENSION RIGHT NOW, OR SHOULD I SAY, YOU KNOW, QUESTIONABLE, LIKE WE'RE QUESTIONING BECAUSE WE REALLY DON'T, I WANT TO MAKE SURE ONCE THESE ARE VOTED ON, IF THEY ARE APPROVED, THAT I'M ABLE TO OFFER SUGGESTIONS. OKAY. IT IS 11:23. THANK YOU ALL FOR JOINING US TODAY. WE HAVE DOCTOR NELSON IN THE HOUSE. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE WITH US, DOCTOR NELSON. AND THEN ALSO BEFORE WE CONCLUDE OUR THOUGHTS AND PRAYERS ARE WITH THE FAMILY OF JESSICA CLARK. SHE WAS A FOWLER MIDDLE SCHOOL TEACHER. SHE TAUGHT BOTH OF MY GIRLS WELL, ACTUALLY ALL THREE. THE BABY THAT IS STILL AT FOWLER. AND SO OUR THOUGHTS AND PRAYERS ARE WITH HER FAMILY. AND WE'RE JUST SENDING PRAYERS ALSO TO FOWLER MIDDLE SCHOOL. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.